-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 438
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
simd std::remove #6322
Open
Johan511
wants to merge
12
commits into
STEllAR-GROUP:master
Choose a base branch
from
Johan511:remove-simd
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+34
−22
Open
simd std::remove #6322
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
528b4e0
unseq find
f2e2640
predicate parameter in simd-helpers first take iterators
7327cb1
changing test according to change made to helper
Johan511 ad84137
adding par_unseq to find
Johan511 a7bd010
unseq
Johan511 e3c741d
removed ExPolicy as template for loop_pred (tag_invoke is being used …
Johan511 adfd8b6
false changed to 0
Johan511 215ae4f
fixed cf
Johan511 e854a45
fixed expolicy not accepting par_unseq
Johan511 ae0cefe
cleanup changes
Johan511 f5d65ce
remove unseq
Johan511 af0ef00
added concepts header
Johan511 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you need to decay the
ExPolicy
here (and in other places)?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we really need decay over here? ExPolicy is only being used for deducing if seq or unseq overload should be called. is_unseq<unseq_policy> should be true for both value and reference right?
Also, please note that this is branched from simd-find.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well, you tell me. I was just asking the question without closer investigation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To the best of my knowledge, I don't believe we need to decay. I am unsure why it was being decayed previously. I assume
is_unseq<unseq_policy>
,is_unseq<unseq_policy&>
andis_unseq<unseq_policy&&>
all evaluate to trueThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@hkaiser I have tried checking behaviour with/without std::decay_t. The correct overloads are called in both cases. I am unsure why std::decay_t is being used.