-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Schematic 24.7.1 Release #1454
Schematic 24.7.1 Release #1454
Conversation
andrewelamb
commented
Jul 2, 2024
•
edited
Loading
edited
- Bug Fix to prevent double manifest version increases in synapse FDS-1875
- Remove service_accout_creds_synapse_id from schematic config FDS-1956
- Bug Fix Publication manifest DOI validation rule FDS-1894 (HTAN) - Changed to investigation ticket, so no fix will be included in the release
- Record based manifests should not include file entity’s if included in the folder FDS-2105: Added based on blocker from VEOIBD on June 6th
… be used by tests
…rsion technical debt: added unit test for changeFileMetaData function
feat: added tracing to schematic code base for manifest generate and manifest submission
…tation feat: set annotations in an async way when submitting a manifest
…anifest-FDS-2015 BugFix: Files no longer added to records based manifests
technical debt: added isort to pre-commit hook in schematic repo
…ync-set-annotation Revert "feat: set annotations in an async way when submitting a manifest"
fix: added black compatibility to isort
This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation. |
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
@linglp Is the security issue raised by sonarcloud somethign we need ot worry about? |
I dismissed it for now.. that issue was fixed in mono repo. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approve it for now after trusting that appropriate tests have been done.