Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add experimental ScicatClient.query_datasets #201

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
May 29, 2024
Merged

Add experimental ScicatClient.query_datasets #201

merged 5 commits into from
May 29, 2024

Conversation

jl-wynen
Copy link
Collaborator

First attempt at solving #177

This is meant as a prototype to try out a simple query syntax. As the docstring says, I am open to changing the interface in the future. But this version should be enough to get some users going with querying and we can improve when we have experience with it and a better idea of where SciCat is headed.

I only added it in the low-level ScicatClient because of the questions raised in #177 about the performance implications of building Dataset objects.

@jl-wynen jl-wynen requested a review from nitrosx April 16, 2024 13:15
@jl-wynen jl-wynen force-pushed the dataset-query branch 2 times, most recently from 4214015 to b62b300 Compare April 19, 2024 13:54
@nvaytet
Copy link
Collaborator

nvaytet commented May 1, 2024

What's the status on this? Are we still waiting for some things to be fixed/clarified on the scicat end?

@nitrosx any input?

@jl-wynen
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jl-wynen commented May 2, 2024

I'm still waiting for clarification / fixes. Especially about which fields are supported and what is the syntax since that seems to have changed back and forth.

@jl-wynen jl-wynen merged commit 1b46daa into main May 29, 2024
11 checks passed
@jl-wynen jl-wynen deleted the dataset-query branch May 29, 2024 08:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants