Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

msg: Add support for extra dependencies to messages function, convert odb to it and add extra dep to cts #6407

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

titan73
Copy link
Contributor

@titan73 titan73 commented Dec 21, 2024

For #6406.

This is similar to what is done for odb but in a generic way that can be reused.
The new messages_multi cmake function can probably be merged in the messages one.

Copy link
Contributor

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

@titan73 titan73 changed the title DRAFT: cts: Fix messages check. cts: Fix messages check. Dec 21, 2024
@@ -95,3 +95,65 @@ function(messages)
WORKING_DIRECTORY ${SOURCE_DIR}
)
endfunction()

function(messages_multi)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This appears to copy the messages function just to add a new DEPENDS argument. Could you just make take an option on the current one and handle if it is empty?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Resent PR which extends messages function, convert odb and fix cts. Updated PR title. Thanks.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 2, 2025

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

@titan73 titan73 reopened this Jan 2, 2025
@titan73 titan73 changed the title cts: Fix messages check. msg: Add support for extra dependencies to messages function, convert odb to it and add extra dep to cts Jan 2, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 2, 2025

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

@titan73
Copy link
Contributor Author

titan73 commented Jan 3, 2025

I created another PR #6468 as I accidentally trashed my branch and couldn't push a typo fix.

@titan73 titan73 closed this Jan 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants