Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merging to release-5.1: [TT-8298] Fixing bug of empty APIName and APIID in access_rights (#5260) #5307

Merged

Conversation

buger
Copy link
Member

@buger buger commented Jul 11, 2023

TT-8298 Fixing bug of empty APIName and APIID in access_rights (#5260)

The tag of APIName and APIID was wrong because of which API was
returning empty string

Description

https://tyktech.atlassian.net/browse/TT-8298
#4350

in house PR for #4854 (to run
CI)

Related Issue

Motivation and Context

How This Has Been Tested

Screenshots (if appropriate)

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
    functionality to change)
  • Refactoring or add test (improvements in base code or adds test
    coverage to functionality)

Checklist

  • I ensured that the documentation is up to date
  • I explained why this PR updates go.mod in detail with reasoning
    why it's required
  • I would like a code coverage CI quality gate exception and have
    explained why

Co-authored-by: Kumar Sukhani [email protected]

The tag of APIName and APIID was wrong because of which API was
returning empty string

<!-- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above -->

## Description

https://tyktech.atlassian.net/browse/TT-8298
#4350

in house PR for #4854 (to run
CI)

## Related Issue

<!-- This project only accepts pull requests related to open issues. -->
<!-- If suggesting a new feature or change, please discuss it in an
issue first. -->
<!-- If fixing a bug, there should be an issue describing it with steps
to reproduce. -->
<!-- OSS: Please link to the issue here. Tyk: please create/link the
JIRA ticket. -->

## Motivation and Context

<!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? -->

## How This Has Been Tested

<!-- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes -->
<!-- Include details of your testing environment, and the tests -->
<!-- you ran to see how your change affects other areas of the code,
etc. -->
<!-- This information is helpful for reviewers and QA. -->

## Screenshots (if appropriate)

## Types of changes

<!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all
the boxes that apply: -->

- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to change)
- [ ] Refactoring or add test (improvements in base code or adds test
coverage to functionality)

## Checklist

<!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply -->
<!-- If there are no documentation updates required, mark the item as
checked. -->
<!-- Raise up any additional concerns not covered by the checklist. -->

- [ ] I ensured that the documentation is up to date
- [ ] I explained why this PR updates go.mod in detail with reasoning
why it's required
- [ ] I would like a code coverage CI quality gate exception and have
explained why

Co-authored-by: Kumar Sukhani <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit a0908cc)
@buger buger enabled auto-merge (squash) July 11, 2023 13:55
@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jul 11, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@buger buger merged commit 6ed1b30 into release-5.1 Jul 11, 2023
10 of 11 checks passed
@buger buger deleted the merge/release-5.1/a0908cc1d6e80fd2c2f626b27cd4c40496cc2aa8 branch July 11, 2023 14:09
@Tyk-ITS
Copy link
Contributor

Tyk-ITS commented Jul 11, 2023

API tests result: failure 🚫
Branch used: refs/pull/5307/merge
Commit:
Triggered by: pull_request (@buger)
Execution page

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants