TT-12821, removed withCache=true from non-cache method

[andrei-tyk]

User description

TT-12821

Summary	[SPIKE] Discover why the OOM happens when downloading large files
Type	Story
Status	In Dev
Points	N/A
Labels	-

---

Description

Related Issue

Motivation and Context

How This Has Been Tested

Screenshots (if appropriate)

Types of changes

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• Refactoring or add test (improvements in base code or adds test coverage to functionality)

Checklist

• I ensured that the documentation is up to date
• I explained why this PR updates go.mod in detail with reasoning why it's required
• I would like a code coverage CI quality gate exception and have explained why

---

PR Type

bug_fix

---

Description

• Fixed a bug in the ServeHTTP method of the ReverseProxy class by changing the withCache parameter from true to false in the WrappedServeHTTP method call. This resolves an issue where caching was incorrectly enabled for a non-cache method.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Bug fix	reverse_proxy.go Fix incorrect caching behavior in `ServeHTTP` method          gateway/reverse_proxy.go Changed the withCache parameter from true to false in the WrappedServeHTTP method call. +1/-1

---

💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment /help "your question" on any pull request to receive relevant information

[buger]

Knock Knock! 🔍

Just thought I'd let you know that your PR title and story title look quite different. PR titles that closely resemble the story title make it easier for reviewers to understand the context of the PR.

An easy-to-understand PR title a day makes the reviewer review away! 😛⚡️

Story Title	[SPIKE] Discover why the OOM happens when downloading large files
PR Title	TT-12821, removed withCache=true from non-cache method

Check out this guide to learn more about PR best-practices.

[github-actions]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ No major issues detected

[github-actions]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

No code suggestions found for the PR.

[github-actions]

API Changes

no api changes detected

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
100.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud