Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[LANDGRIF-1606] refactors the notification of the Import Data Progress to the sockets. #1230

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

KevSanchez
Copy link
Contributor

General description

Please write a description. If the PR is hard to understand, provide a quick explanation of the code.

Designs

Link to the related design prototypes (if applicable)

Testing instructions

Provide minimal instructions on how to test this PR.

  • Apart from the added feature / bug fix, check overall performance, styling...

Checklist before merging

  • Branch name / PR includes the related Jira ticket Id.
  • Tests to check core implementation / bug fix added.
  • All checks in Continuous Integration workflow pass.
  • Feature functionally tested by reviewer(s).
  • Code reviewed by reviewer(s).
  • Documentation updated (README, CHANGELOG...) (if required)

@KevSanchez KevSanchez requested a review from alexeh February 21, 2025 09:41
Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 21, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

3 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
landgriffon-client ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Feb 25, 2025 11:55am
landgriffon-cookie-traceability ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Feb 25, 2025 11:55am
landgriffon-marketing ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Feb 25, 2025 11:55am

@KevSanchez KevSanchez force-pushed the refactor/api/LANDGRIF-1606-refactor-import-progress-socket-notification branch from a3e25a2 to 18f8aad Compare February 25, 2025 11:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant