-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DataViews: sort author by name + allow custom sort function #64064
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f469303
Rename for clarity
oandregal 7f4ecf1
Provide a custom sort for author
oandregal 6e9b21c
Data: provide only sort
oandregal b1ce0e1
Pass the items to the sort function
oandregal 4460490
Type the items
oandregal 344ca6d
Update comment
oandregal bcf814a
Pass getValue as a parameter to sort
oandregal eaa0b63
Pass item & value to sort function
oandregal 621ac69
Simplify Sort API
youknowriad File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -140,18 +140,24 @@ export function filterSortAndPaginate< Item >( | |
} ); | ||
if ( fieldToSort ) { | ||
filteredData.sort( ( a, b ) => { | ||
const valueA = fieldToSort.getValue( { item: a } ) ?? ''; | ||
const valueB = fieldToSort.getValue( { item: b } ) ?? ''; | ||
|
||
if ( fieldToSort.type === 'integer' ) { | ||
return fieldToSort.sort( | ||
oandregal marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
a, | ||
b, | ||
view.sort?.direction ?? 'desc', | ||
fieldToSort.getValue | ||
{ | ||
item: a, | ||
value: valueA, | ||
}, | ||
{ | ||
item: b, | ||
value: valueB, | ||
}, | ||
view.sort?.direction ?? 'desc' | ||
); | ||
} | ||
|
||
// When/if types become required, we can remove the following logic. | ||
const valueA = fieldToSort.getValue( { item: a } ) ?? ''; | ||
const valueB = fieldToSort.getValue( { item: b } ) ?? ''; | ||
if ( | ||
typeof valueA === 'number' && | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Note that I've left the existing logic here because |
||
typeof valueB === 'number' | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why have Item here at all? I was thinking
a: any, b: any
should be sufficient no?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see what you did, I think you're misunderstanding what I'm suggesting. I'm suggesting that
fieldType.sort
andfield.sort
to have different APIs. one receives the items, the other receives the values. Do you want me to try to commit what I have in mind?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@youknowriad please, be welcome to push. In my mind both functions are instances of the same idea, so they'd have the same signature. But I'm open to try different things: push and we can discuss what's there.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For me field types and fields work at different levels, field types work on values, fields work on items, so it doesn't make sense to have the same API.
I've pushed what I had in mind in 621ac69
Feel free to revert if you don't like it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
621ac69 works for me.