Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FEDX-1789: Migarte to gha-dart-oss #101

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 17, 2024
Merged

Conversation

matthewnitschke-wk
Copy link
Contributor

@matthewnitschke-wk matthewnitschke-wk commented Oct 17, 2024

FEDX-1789

Issue Status

Motivation

Implements gha-dart-oss for this repo. This has the added benefit of implementing auto-pub-publishing

QA Checklist

  • CI passes

@matthewnitschke-wk matthewnitschke-wk marked this pull request as ready for review October 17, 2024 21:09
@aviary2-wf
Copy link

Security Insights

No security relevant content was detected by automated scans.

Action Items

  • Review PR for security impact; comment "security review required" if needed or unsure
  • Verify aviary.yaml coverage of security relevant code

Questions or Comments? Reach out on Slack: #support-infosec.

robbecker-wf
robbecker-wf previously approved these changes Oct 17, 2024
@bender-wk bender-wk changed the title Migarte to gha-dart-oss FEDX-1789: Migarte to gha-dart-oss Oct 17, 2024
@matthewnitschke-wk
Copy link
Contributor Author

QA +1

  • CI does indeed pass

🚀 @Workiva/release-management-p 🚢

Copy link
Contributor

@rmconsole-wf rmconsole-wf left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 from RM

@rmconsole2-wf rmconsole2-wf merged commit 586db7d into master Oct 17, 2024
27 checks passed
@rmconsole2-wf rmconsole2-wf deleted the migrate_to_gha-dart-oss branch October 17, 2024 22:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants