Constitutive laws for elastic mechanics are incorrect #676
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Due to the split code pathway and implementation for solid and shell (
StressPK2
/StressCauchy
), the material models are yielding mismatching stress results meaning material models behave differently whether a material model is used with a solid or a shell.For all those material models, we currently have the invariant$\mathbf{F}\mathbf{S}\mathbf{F}^T/J = \boldsymbol\sigma$ violated, which is mathematically wrong and undesired, a material must have a unique definition that does not vary depending on the stress measure.