-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Import FX graph node name #131
base: feature/backport_ea1_ops
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Import FX graph node name #131
Conversation
57ed408
to
d7d21fa
Compare
d7d21fa
to
983ce1a
Compare
983ce1a
to
f719bf6
Compare
f719bf6
to
caca87b
Compare
@cmcgirr-amd, I cleaned this up and added test. I think we can go ahead and merge this. |
@mgehre-amd did you add the test here or in another repo? |
Oh shoot, I was thinking about another PR. I will add a test here. |
|
||
// Whether to add the FXOutputName attribute from the debug name of the jit | ||
// node. | ||
bool addFxOutputName = false; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In the context of torch-mlir this output name would be the tensor "SSA" name we see in the FX graph right? Maybe its worth mentioning it in the comment.
We have just been filling OutputName with the name of the operation that created the output. Might be confusing.
No description provided.