Start of chapter 2 with some supporting images

chap2.tex

@@ -11,11 +11,29 @@
 
 \chapter{The T2K Experiment}
 \label{chap:T2KExperiment}
+\begin{figure}
+  \centering
+  \includegraphics[width=10cm]{images/t2k/t2k_schematic.pdf}
+  \caption{The T2K experiment.}
+  \label{fig:T2KSchematic}
+\end{figure}
+
+
+The Tokai-to-Kamioka (T2K) experiment~\cite{Abe2011106} is a long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment located in two sites across Japan which was designed to study the parameters governing the PMNS matrix.  The first site is the J-PARC facility in Tokai-mura on Japan's east cost which houses a 30 GeV proton accelerator complex that is used to generate a highly pure $\nu_\mu$ beam.  J-PARC also contains a suite of detectors designed to measure the neutrino beam's unoscillated characteristics.  Super-Kamiokande (SK) is located 295 km (see Fig.~\ref{fig:T2KSchematic}) and measures the contents of the neutrino beam post-oscillation.
+\newline
+T2K was the first experiment to observe the $\nu_\mu\rightarrow\nu_e$ appearance channel~\cite{PhysRevLett.112.061802} which excluded $\theta_{13} = 0$ at 7.3$\textrm{\sigma}$ significance.  By comparing this result with precise $\theta_{13}$ measurements from reactor experiments, $\textrm{\delta}_{\textrm{CP}}$ regions can be excluded at 90$\%$ confidence level (see Fig.~\ref{fig:NueAppearanceContour}).  T2K's precision analysis of the $\nu_\mu$ disappearance channel provide world leading measurements of $\textrm{\theta}_{23}$ and $\Delta m^2_{23}$.  Independently of the oscillation analyses performed by the experiment, T2K's near detectors, ND280 and INGRID, are used to measure a range of neutrino cross-sections~\cite{PhysRevLett.113.241803, PhysRevD.87.092003}.  While this is not the primary aim of T2K, such measurements are still extremely important as T2K systematic uncertainties can be constrained with additional cross-section knowledge as well as helping to understand the general neutrino interaction picture.
+
+\begin{figure}
+  \centering
+  \includegraphics[width=7.5cm]{images/t2k/nue_appearance_Theta13Delta_contour.eps}
+  \caption{The 68$\%$ and 90$\%$ confidence level allowed regions for $\sin^22\theta_{13}$ as a function of $\textrm{\delta}_{\textrm{CP}}$ for normal hierachy (top) and inverted hierarchy (bottom)  The solid line represents the best fit $\sin^22\theta_{13}$ for a given $\textrm{\delta}_{\textrm{CP}}$.  The shaded region shows the average $\theta_{13}$ provided by the reactor constraint~\cite{PhysRevLett.112.061802}.}
+  \label{fig:NueAppearanceContour}
+\end{figure}
 
 
 \section{Accelerator complex}
 \label{sec:AcceleratorComplex}
-These are words
+The T2K neutrino beam is generated by J-PARC's accelerator complex which produces a 30 GeV proton beam which is fired at a fixed graphite target.  The final states particles of the target interaction are predominately charged pions which decay to produce the neutrino beam.  Surrounding and behind the graphite target are a set of magnetic horns which focus the pions into a beam, resulting in a focused neutrino beam after the hadrons have decayed.
 
 \subsection{Proton Accelerators}
 \label{subsec:ProtonAccelerators}
@@ -66,3 +84,4 @@ \subsection{The far detector}
 I mean SK
 
 
+

thesis.bbl

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-\begin{thebibliography}{1}
+\begin{thebibliography}{10}
 
 \bibitem{Phys.Rev.Lett.19.1264}
 S.~Weinberg,
@@ -12,6 +12,24 @@ S.~L. Glashow, J.~Iliopoulos, and L.~Maiani,
 S.~Willenbrock,
 \newblock (2004), hep-ph/0410370.
 
+\bibitem{Abe2011106}
+K.~Abe {\em et~al.},
+\newblock Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A:
+  Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment {\bf 659},
+  106  (2011).
+
+\bibitem{PhysRevLett.112.061802}
+(T2K Collaboration), K.~Abe {\em et~al.},
+\newblock Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 112}, 061802 (2014).
+
+\bibitem{PhysRevLett.113.241803}
+(T2K Collaboration), K.~Abe {\em et~al.},
+\newblock Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 113}, 241803 (2014).
+
+\bibitem{PhysRevD.87.092003}
+K.~Abe {\em et~al.},
+\newblock Phys. Rev. D {\bf 87}, 092003 (2013).
+
 \bibitem{Hough:1959qva}
 P.~a. Hough,
 \newblock Conf.Proc. {\bf C590914}, 554 (1959).

thesis.blg

@@ -3,44 +3,44 @@ Capacity: max_strings=35307, hash_size=35307, hash_prime=30011
 The top-level auxiliary file: thesis.aux
 The style file: h-physrev.bst
 Database file #1: mythesis.bib
-You've used 6 entries,
+You've used 10 entries,
             1946 wiz_defined-function locations,
-            639 strings with 5424 characters,
-and the built_in function-call counts, 1189 in all, are:
-= -- 83
-> -- 47
+            672 strings with 30994 characters,
+and the built_in function-call counts, 2093 in all, are:
+= -- 147
+> -- 87
 < -- 1
-+ -- 15
-- -- 9
-* -- 84
-:= -- 160
-add.period$ -- 6
-call.type$ -- 6
++ -- 31
+- -- 17
+* -- 156
+:= -- 274
+add.period$ -- 10
+call.type$ -- 10
 change.case$ -- 1
 chr.to.int$ -- 0
-cite$ -- 6
-duplicate$ -- 73
-empty$ -- 130
-format.name$ -- 15
-if$ -- 279
+cite$ -- 10
+duplicate$ -- 117
+empty$ -- 220
+format.name$ -- 27
+if$ -- 495
 int.to.chr$ -- 0
-int.to.str$ -- 6
-missing$ -- 6
-newline$ -- 28
-num.names$ -- 6
-pop$ -- 34
+int.to.str$ -- 10
+missing$ -- 10
+newline$ -- 44
+num.names$ -- 10
+pop$ -- 49
 preamble$ -- 1
 purify$ -- 0
 quote$ -- 0
-skip$ -- 48
+skip$ -- 96
 stack$ -- 0
-substring$ -- 55
-swap$ -- 21
+substring$ -- 125
+swap$ -- 33
 text.length$ -- 1
 text.prefix$ -- 0
 top$ -- 0
 type$ -- 0
 warning$ -- 0
-while$ -- 12
-width$ -- 7
-write$ -- 49
+while$ -- 20
+width$ -- 12
+write$ -- 79

thesis.lof

@@ -2,24 +2,28 @@
 \select@language {english}
 \addvspace {10\p@ }
 \addvspace {10\p@ }
-\addvspace {10\p@ }
-\addvspace {10\p@ }
-\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {\relax 4.1}{\ignorespaces Line in 2D cartesian space.\relax }}{10}{figure.caption.2}
-\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {\relax 4.2}{\ignorespaces Point in 2D parameter space.\relax }}{10}{figure.caption.2}
-\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {\relax 4.3}{\ignorespaces Point in 2D cartesian space.\relax }}{11}{figure.caption.3}
-\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {\relax 4.4}{\ignorespaces Line in 2D parameter space.\relax }}{11}{figure.caption.3}
-\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {\relax 4.5}{\ignorespaces The three cartesian points defined in equation~\ref {eq:HTExampleCartesianPoints}. The colour coding matches that of Fig.~\ref {fig:HTExampleParameterSpace}.\relax }}{12}{figure.caption.4}
-\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {\relax 4.6}{\ignorespaces The three parameter lines defined in equation~\ref {eq:HTExampleParameterLines}. The same colour coding as Fig.~\ref {fig:HTExampleCartesianSpace} is used.\relax }}{12}{figure.caption.4}
-\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {\relax 4.7}{\ignorespaces The line represented by the intersection in Fig.~\ref {fig:HTExampleParameterSpace} with the cartesian points it intercepts.\relax }}{13}{figure.caption.5}
-\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {\relax 4.8}{\ignorespaces $\mymath {\@Oldtheta }\xspace -\mymath {\@Oldrho }\xspace $ parameterisation of a 2D line.\relax }}{14}{figure.caption.6}
-\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {\relax 4.9}{\ignorespaces The discrete $\mymath {\@Oldtheta }\xspace -\mymath {\@Oldrho }\xspace $ space. The plotted lines are those defined in equation~\ref {eq:HTExampleParameterLines} and reparameterised using equation~\ref {eq:ParameterLineReparameterisation}.\relax }}{15}{figure.caption.7}
-\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {\relax 4.10}{\ignorespaces Simulated neutrino interaction with 3 final states in the side-right ECal. The green line entering from the left is the $\mymath {\@Oldnu }\xspace _\mymath {\@Oldmu }\xspace $. The green line exiting to the right is a $\mymath {\@Oldmu }\xspace ^{-}$, the brown line is a $\mymath {\@Oldpi }\xspace ^+$ and the blue line is a proton. The purple rectangles represent the hit ECal bars.\relax }}{16}{figure.caption.8}
-\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {\relax 4.11}{\ignorespaces Grid representation of an ECal bar.\relax }}{17}{figure.caption.9}
-\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {\relax 4.12}{\ignorespaces Single ECal bar Hough transform using the point configuration shown in Fig.~\ref {fig:ECalBarGridRepresentation}.\relax }}{17}{figure.caption.9}
-\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {\relax 4.13}{\ignorespaces Cross representation of an ECal bar.\relax }}{18}{figure.caption.10}
-\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {\relax 4.14}{\ignorespaces Single ECal bar Hough transform using the point configuration shown in Fig.~\ref {fig:ECalBarCrossRepresentation}.\relax }}{18}{figure.caption.10}
-\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {\relax 4.15}{\ignorespaces The full parameter space of the 2D cluster shown in Fig.~\ref {fig:3StateInteractionNoReconstruction}.\relax }}{19}{figure.caption.11}
-\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {\relax 4.16}{\ignorespaces The reduced parameter space of the 2D cluster shown in Fig.~\ref {fig:3StateInteractionNoReconstruction}.\relax }}{21}{figure.caption.12}
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {\relax 2.1}{\ignorespaces The T2K experiment.\relax }}{3}{figure.caption.2}
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {\relax 2.2}{\ignorespaces The 68$\%$ and 90$\%$ confidence level allowed regions for $\qopname \relax o{sin}^22\mymath {\@Oldtheta }\xspace _{13}$ as a function of $\textrm {\mymath {\@Olddelta }\xspace }_{\textrm {CP}}$ for normal hierachy (top) and inverted hierarchy (bottom) The solid line represents the best fit $\qopname \relax o{sin}^22\mymath {\@Oldtheta }\xspace _{13}$ for a given $\textrm {\mymath {\@Olddelta }\xspace }_{\textrm {CP}}$. The shaded region shows the average $\mymath {\@Oldtheta }\xspace _{13}$ provided by the reactor constraint~\cite {PhysRevLett.112.061802}.\relax }}{4}{figure.caption.3}
+\addvspace {10\p@ }
+\addvspace {10\p@ }
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {\relax 4.1}{\ignorespaces Line in 2D cartesian space.\relax }}{12}{figure.caption.4}
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {\relax 4.2}{\ignorespaces Point in 2D parameter space.\relax }}{12}{figure.caption.4}
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {\relax 4.3}{\ignorespaces Point in 2D cartesian space.\relax }}{13}{figure.caption.5}
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {\relax 4.4}{\ignorespaces Line in 2D parameter space.\relax }}{13}{figure.caption.5}
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {\relax 4.5}{\ignorespaces The three cartesian points defined in equation~\ref {eq:HTExampleCartesianPoints}. The colour coding matches that of Fig.~\ref {fig:HTExampleParameterSpace}.\relax }}{14}{figure.caption.6}
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {\relax 4.6}{\ignorespaces The three parameter lines defined in equation~\ref {eq:HTExampleParameterLines}. The same colour coding as Fig.~\ref {fig:HTExampleCartesianSpace} is used.\relax }}{14}{figure.caption.6}
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {\relax 4.7}{\ignorespaces The line represented by the intersection in Fig.~\ref {fig:HTExampleParameterSpace} with the cartesian points it intercepts.\relax }}{15}{figure.caption.7}
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {\relax 4.8}{\ignorespaces $\mymath {\@Oldtheta }\xspace -\mymath {\@Oldrho }\xspace $ parameterisation of a 2D line.\relax }}{16}{figure.caption.8}
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {\relax 4.9}{\ignorespaces The discrete $\mymath {\@Oldtheta }\xspace -\mymath {\@Oldrho }\xspace $ space. The plotted lines are those defined in equation~\ref {eq:HTExampleParameterLines} and reparameterised using equation~\ref {eq:ParameterLineReparameterisation}.\relax }}{17}{figure.caption.9}
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {\relax 4.10}{\ignorespaces Simulated neutrino interaction with 3 final states in the side-right ECal. The green line entering from the left is the $\mymath {\@Oldnu }\xspace _\mymath {\@Oldmu }\xspace $. The green line exiting to the right is a $\mymath {\@Oldmu }\xspace ^{-}$, the brown line is a $\mymath {\@Oldpi }\xspace ^+$ and the blue line is a proton. The purple rectangles represent the hit ECal bars.\relax }}{18}{figure.caption.10}
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {\relax 4.11}{\ignorespaces Grid representation of an ECal bar.\relax }}{19}{figure.caption.11}
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {\relax 4.12}{\ignorespaces Single ECal bar Hough transform using the point configuration shown in Fig.~\ref {fig:ECalBarGridRepresentation}.\relax }}{19}{figure.caption.11}
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {\relax 4.13}{\ignorespaces Cross representation of an ECal bar.\relax }}{20}{figure.caption.12}
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {\relax 4.14}{\ignorespaces Single ECal bar Hough transform using the point configuration shown in Fig.~\ref {fig:ECalBarCrossRepresentation}.\relax }}{20}{figure.caption.12}
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {\relax 4.15}{\ignorespaces The full parameter space of the 2D cluster shown in Fig.~\ref {fig:3StateInteractionNoReconstruction}.\relax }}{21}{figure.caption.13}
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {\relax 4.16}{\ignorespaces The reduced parameter space of the 2D cluster shown in Fig.~\ref {fig:3StateInteractionNoReconstruction}.\relax }}{23}{figure.caption.14}
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {\relax 4.17}{\ignorespaces $Q_{\textrm {ratio}}$ distribution in the barrel ECal for the two track case. The blue distribution refers to matching pairs which were matched to the same true particle. Both distributions are unit normalised.\relax }}{24}{figure.caption.15}
+\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {\relax 4.18}{\ignorespaces $Q_{\textrm {ratio}}$ probability density distribution in the barrel ECal for the two track case.\relax }}{24}{figure.caption.15}
 \addvspace {10\p@ }
 \addvspace {10\p@ }
 \addvspace {10\p@ }