Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update api-reference.md #743

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 19, 2025
Merged

Update api-reference.md #743

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 19, 2025

Conversation

praveek
Copy link
Contributor

@praveek praveek commented Feb 18, 2025

Description

Related Issue

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • I have signed the Adobe Open Source CLA.
  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.


// Optionally, if you need a callback:
// MobileCore.initialize(this, YOUR_APP_ID, new AdobeCallback<Object>() {
// // SDK initialized.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you need to include for a more complete example?

@Override
public void call(Void result) {
   // SDK initialized.
}

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, we have a similar snippet for all the other callbacks. Do you have anything in mind?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm just thinking of being consistent with the example on line 200 for initialize with options.

@kevinlind kevinlind merged commit 93460ba into main Feb 19, 2025
21 checks passed
@praveek praveek deleted the praveek-patch-1 branch February 24, 2025 23:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants