Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

APPS-1490 Fix backup files sorting error #211

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 29, 2025

Conversation

filkeith
Copy link
Contributor

@filkeith filkeith commented Jan 29, 2025

  • fix sorting error
  • fix restore documentation

- fix sorting error
- fix documentation
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 29, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 78.34%. Comparing base (fcff047) to head (b3ecdf4).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           xdr-support     #211   +/-   ##
============================================
  Coverage        78.33%   78.34%           
============================================
  Files              109      109           
  Lines             9975     9968    -7     
============================================
- Hits              7814     7809    -5     
+ Misses            1655     1653    -2     
  Partials           506      506           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@filkeith filkeith requested a review from reugn January 29, 2025 13:39
@reugn reugn changed the title APPS-1490 Fix sorting error APPS-1490 Fix backup files sorting error Jan 29, 2025
internal/util/files_sort.go Show resolved Hide resolved
- removed unused code
@filkeith filkeith merged commit 339fc5a into xdr-support Jan 29, 2025
4 checks passed
@filkeith filkeith deleted the APPS-1490-fix-sort-error branch January 29, 2025 14:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants