Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

APPS-1500 Validate record exists policy for asbx restore #219

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 4, 2025

Conversation

filkeith
Copy link
Contributor

@filkeith filkeith commented Feb 4, 2025

  • throw an error on asbx restore with -u or -r flags

- throw an error on asbx restore with -u or -r flags
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 14.28571% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 78.52%. Comparing base (1e94313) to head (22b3a37).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
config_restore.go 14.28% 4 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##           xdr-support     #219      +/-   ##
===============================================
- Coverage        78.57%   78.52%   -0.05%     
===============================================
  Files              110      110              
  Lines             9954     9961       +7     
===============================================
+ Hits              7821     7822       +1     
- Misses            1635     1639       +4     
- Partials           498      500       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@filkeith filkeith requested a review from reugn February 4, 2025 16:02
@reugn reugn changed the title APPS-1500 Add uniq and replace flag check on asbx resotre APPS-1500 Validate record exists policy for asbx restore Feb 4, 2025
@filkeith filkeith merged commit cda5813 into xdr-support Feb 4, 2025
4 checks passed
@filkeith filkeith deleted the APPS-1500-uniq-replace-error branch February 4, 2025 16:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants