[RFC] gbp-pull: similar force update strategy for all branches #53
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
This would also fix http://bugs.debian.org/875852 |
marquiz
force-pushed
the
feature/gbp-pull
branch
from
b50a0a5
to
e6b33cc
Compare
marquiz
force-pushed
the
feature/gbp-pull
branch
from
e6b33cc
to
d383c44
Compare
|
ping @agx, any thoughts on this? |
marquiz
force-pushed
the
feature/gbp-pull
branch
2 times, most recently
from
18e4242
to
9d1bc83
Compare
When using --force, treat non-checked-out branches similarly to the current branch. That is, do git merge, instead of just setting the ref. Also, renames fast_forward_branch() to update_branch() to better match the functionality. Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <[email protected]>
marquiz
force-pushed
the
feature/gbp-pull
branch
from
9d1bc83
to
d5abdd2
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follow-up from #39. This patch is probably not ready for merging, but, a base for discussion.
Discussion from #39