Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
benchmarks/mdp/zeroconf: Fix incorrect reference
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
remco1112 committed Aug 24, 2020
1 parent afd4bb5 commit 12af1c0
Showing 1 changed file with 1 addition and 1 deletion.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion benchmarks/mdp/zeroconf/index.json
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
"name": "the PRISM Benchmark Suite",
"url": "http://www.prismmodelchecker.org/benchmarks/"
},
"description": "This is a PRISM case study [1]. Upon being connected to the network, a device is first required to choose randomly an IP address from a pool of 65024 available addresses. Then the device sends messages to the other devices connected to the network, asking whether any of those devices are currently using the chosen IP address. If no reply is received even after the devices resend such messages three more times, then the device starts using the IP address, initially sending two more messages asserting that the device is claiming the address. `N´ is the number of abstract hosts communicating over the network, `K´ is the number of probes to send and `loss´ means the probability of message loss. See [1] for more details about the model and [2] for more details about the protocol.",
"description": "This is a PRISM case study [1]. Upon being connected to the network, a device is first required to choose randomly an IP address from a pool of 65024 available addresses. Then the device sends messages to the other devices connected to the network, asking whether any of those devices are currently using the chosen IP address. If no reply is received even after the devices resend such messages three more times, then the device starts using the IP address, initially sending two more messages asserting that the device is claiming the address. `N´ is the number of abstract hosts communicating over the network, `K´ is the number of probes to send and `loss´ means the probability of message loss. See [2] for more details about the model and [3] for more details about the protocol.",
"references": [
"https://doi.org/10.1109/QEST.2012.14",
"http://www.prismmodelchecker.org/casestudies/zeroconf.php",
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 12af1c0

Please sign in to comment.