ci(doc): pandoc setting #69
Conversation
shenxiangzhuang
added
documentation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces updates to the GitHub Actions workflow for documentation building and deployment. The changes focus on modernizing the workflow by updating the operating system to the latest Ubuntu version, streamlining Pandoc setup using an official GitHub Action, and improving Python version management through a more robust setup method. Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/build_docs.yaml (1)
25-25: Good improvement using the official Pandoc action!Using the official
pandoc/actions/setupaction is a more maintainable solution than manual installation. However, consider using a more specific version tag (e.g.,v1.1.0) instead ofv1for better reproducibility.- uses: pandoc/actions/setup@v1 + uses: pandoc/actions/[email protected]Also applies to: 57-57
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/build_docs.yaml(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/build_docs.yaml (2)
Line range hint 70-72: Excellent use of pyproject.toml for version management!
Using python-version-file with pyproject.toml is a great practice for centralizing Python version management. This ensures consistency between local development and CI environments.
Let's verify the Python version specification:
✅ Verification successful
Python version configuration in pyproject.toml is correctly specified
The verification confirms that pyproject.toml properly specifies the Python version constraint as >= 3.11,<3.13, which is a clear and appropriate version range for the project. This aligns perfectly with the GitHub Actions workflow using python-version-file to source this configuration.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify Python version specification in pyproject.toml
if [ -f "pyproject.toml" ]; then
echo "Python version specified in pyproject.toml:"
rg "python\s*=" pyproject.toml
else
echo "pyproject.toml not found!"
fi
Length of output: 191
17-17: Consider the implications of using ubuntu-latest
While using ubuntu-latest ensures you're always on the newest Ubuntu version, it might introduce unexpected behavior when Ubuntu releases major updates. Consider if pinning to a specific version (e.g., ubuntu-22.04) would be more appropriate for reproducible builds.
Let's check the current mapping of ubuntu-latest:
Also applies to: 52-52
✅ Verification successful
This will help us understand:
- How many workflow files use Ubuntu runners
- What versions are used across the codebase
- If there's a consistent pattern in version specification
This information will help us make a more informed recommendation about using ubuntu-latest vs a specific version.
Using ubuntu-latest aligns with repository-wide practices
The codebase consistently uses ubuntu-latest across all GitHub Actions workflows:
build_docs.yaml: Usesubuntu-latestfor both jobstest.yaml: Usesubuntu-latestin matrix configurationpython-publish.yml: Usesubuntu-latestfor deployment
The consistent usage across the repository suggests this is an intentional pattern, likely chosen to automatically benefit from security updates and improvements in newer Ubuntu versions while maintaining consistency across all workflows.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the current ubuntu-latest version in GitHub Actions
gh api \
-H "Accept: application/vnd.github+json" \
-H "X-GitHub-Api-Version: 2022-11-28" \
/repos/actions/runner-images/contents/images/linux/Ubuntu2204-Readme.md | \
jq -r '.content' | base64 -d | head -n 5
Length of output: 322
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if there are any other workflow files that might show patterns of Ubuntu version usage
fd -e yml -e yaml . .github/workflows/ --exec grep -l "ubuntu-" {} \;
# For each found file, let's see the context of ubuntu version usage
fd -e yml -e yaml . .github/workflows/ --exec sh -c 'echo "=== {} ==="; grep -A 2 -B 2 "ubuntu-" "{}"' \;
Length of output: 1130
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #69 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 38.83% 38.83%
=======================================
Files 9 9
Lines 394 394
=======================================
Hits 153 153
Misses 241 241 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Summary by CodeRabbit