GH-37253: [MATLAB] Add test cases which verify that the NumFields
, BitWidth
, and ID
properties can not be modified to hFixedWidth
test class
#37316
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rationale for this change
As @sgilmore10 pointed out in #37250 (comment), it makes sense to move the tests which verify that the
NumFields
,BitWidth
, andID
properties cannot be set into thehFixedWidthType
superclass, rather than having these tests implemented intTime32Type
andtTime64Type
, since they are common to all fixed width types.What changes are included in this PR?
BitWidth
,NumFields
, andID
properties cannot be set out of thetTime32Type
andtTime64Type
classes and into the superclasshFixedWidthType
.tTime32Type
andtTime64Type
. Changed variable nameschema
totype
.Are these changes tested?
Yes.
BitWidth
,NumFields
, andID
properties cannot be set out of thetTime32Type
andtTime64Type
classes and into the superclasshFixedWidthType
.Are there any user-facing changes?
No.
This pull request only modifies tests.
NumFields
,BitWidth
, andID
properties can not be modified tohFixedWidth
test class #37253