Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Cloudscale install documentation to enable machine-api provider #365

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

HappyTetrahedron
Copy link
Contributor

I imagine at some point we'll update the openshift4-terraform defaults for cloudscale to have infra and worker counts of 0. For now, though, I assume that this is not the case and have the install instructions explicitly leave an override in.

Once we're fully migrated, we will probably also have the machine-api-provider-cloudscale component enabled and configured by default, and that step will be superfluous as well. (There's a small bootstrapping snag here: the component config tries to access the ignition CA from the openshift4-terraform config. On the very first catalog compile, that isn't there. But I'm sure we can work around that once we get that far.)

@HappyTetrahedron HappyTetrahedron requested a review from a team November 15, 2024 10:26
@@ -132,6 +163,30 @@ terraform apply
popd
----

. Review and merge the LB hieradata MR (listed in Terraform output `hieradata_mr`) and run Puppet on the LBs after the deploy job has completed
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This won't be sufficient for cloudscale anymore, since this also ensures that the ingress backends are set to the infra node IPs. This isn't done anymore for cloudscale since we set infra_count=0 and we'll need a replacement step after scaling up the infra nodes which sets their IPs in the hieradata so that the ingress HAProxy config has backends.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants