Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add latency timeseries output #8
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
add latency timeseries output #8
Changes from all commits
9610e29
ab15ce4
15a4ab9
66294be
3e5b003
d899d65
e2ee97c
eeafca0
fe8e81a
8fd1974
8b5ac0d
43ecded
70bd08f
d1761b6
2e9fe43
77d19de
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As Dave mentioned earlier, this check is going to eat the first line of the timeseries output. You should put a comment here noting that, if it's actually intentional.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not following how you are seeing that the first line gets eaten.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Try your experiment with
i
set to an iterator or a generator. With it set to alist
, of course you see the first item when you check after theall()
call, because the list state is unchanged. 😁(Just to be blisteringly clear, reading a file line-by-line in a loop uses an iterator/generator.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"deliniator" ==> "delineator"
"wont'" ==> "won't"