Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix parsing #516

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 12, 2024
Merged

fix parsing #516

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 12, 2024

Conversation

sharlotta93
Copy link
Contributor

@sharlotta93 sharlotta93 commented Nov 12, 2024

User description

isEmpty is not good when dealing with numbers because isEmpty(123) returns true which is bad for us because it should be false


PR Type

Bug fix


Description

  • Fixed a bug in the parsing logic by replacing isEmpty with isNil to correctly handle numeric values.
  • Enhanced mock constants by adding heightNote and weightNote fields to the vitalsExample object.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
constants.ts
Add notes for height and weight in mock constants               

extensions/elation/mocks/constants.ts

  • Added heightNote and weightNote fields to the vitalsExample object.
  • +2/-0     
    Bug fix
    addVitals.ts
    Fix parsing logic to handle numeric values correctly         

    extensions/elation/actions/addVitals/addVitals.ts

  • Replaced isEmpty with isNil for better handling of numeric values.
  • Improved condition to check for undefined or nil values.
  • +2/-2     

    💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment /help "your question" on any pull request to receive relevant information

    Copy link

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    ⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

    Possible Bug
    The replacement of isEmpty with isNil might not address the original issue if value is a number. isNil only checks for null or undefined, not whether a value is numerically empty or zero.

    Copy link

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    Explore these optional code suggestions:

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Possible bug
    Improve the validation logic for string fields to ensure they are not just non-empty but also non-blank

    Ensure that the isEmpty function is appropriate for checking note since isEmpty will
    return true for any falsy value, which might not be the intended behavior if note is
    expected to be a non-empty string.

    extensions/elation/actions/addVitals/addVitals.ts [23]

    -return isEmpty(note)
    +return note !== undefined && note.trim() !== ''
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: This suggestion correctly identifies a potential issue with using isEmpty for string validation, which might not behave as expected for whitespace strings, thus improving the robustness of the data validation.

    8
    Performance
    Simplify null or undefined checks by using direct comparisons instead of lodash functions

    Replace the use of isNil with a direct check for null or undefined since isNil from
    lodash is unnecessary for a simple undefined or null check and adds overhead.

    extensions/elation/actions/addVitals/addVitals.ts [22]

    -if (value !== undefined && !isNil(value)) {
    +if (value !== undefined && value !== null) {
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: Replacing isNil with direct null checks simplifies the code and reduces dependency on lodash, which can improve performance slightly.

    7

    @sharlotta93 sharlotta93 merged commit 0a99304 into main Nov 12, 2024
    2 of 3 checks passed
    @sharlotta93 sharlotta93 deleted the tidy-up-the-action branch November 12, 2024 17:48
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    2 participants