Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(execution): another defer ticker fix #2070

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 15, 2024
Merged

Conversation

abi87
Copy link
Contributor

@abi87 abi87 commented Oct 14, 2024

Duly stopping the ticker within the right goroutine

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Corrected a typographical error in the comment of the Start method for the EngineClient struct.
  • Improvements

    • Enhanced the logging mechanism in the ReportingService to ensure continuous version reporting until completion, improving service reliability.

@abi87 abi87 self-assigned this Oct 14, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 14, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request includes two main changes: a minor typographical correction in the comment of the Start method within the EngineClient struct and a modification to the Start method of the ReportingService struct. The latter change involves repositioning the defer ticker.Stop() statement to enhance the control flow, ensuring that the ticker operates correctly until the context signals completion.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
mod/execution/pkg/client/client.go Corrected a typographical error in the comment of the Start method of the EngineClient struct.
mod/node-core/pkg/services/version/version.go Repositioned defer ticker.Stop() inside the goroutine in the Start method of the ReportingService struct to improve logging control flow.

Possibly related PRs

  • chore(execution): fixed tickers stop #2059: The changes in this PR involve modifications to the Start method in both the Client struct and the ReportingService struct, which directly relates to the minor correction made in the Start method of the EngineClient struct in the main PR.

Suggested reviewers

  • nidhi-singh02
  • itsdevbear

Poem

🐇 In code we hop, with comments bright,
A typo fixed, now feels just right.
The ticker ticks, through day and night,
Reporting versions, a joyful sight!
With every change, our code takes flight! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 14, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 22.25%. Comparing base (18f5d37) to head (c189199).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
mod/execution/pkg/client/client.go 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
mod/node-core/pkg/services/version/version.go 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2070   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   22.25%   22.25%           
=======================================
  Files         356      356           
  Lines       16021    16020    -1     
  Branches       12       12           
=======================================
  Hits         3566     3566           
+ Misses      12303    12302    -1     
  Partials      152      152           
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
mod/execution/pkg/client/client.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
mod/node-core/pkg/services/version/version.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range comments (2)
mod/node-core/pkg/services/version/version.go (2)

Line range hint 76-77: Remove unnecessary continue statement

The continue statement here is unnecessary as the loop will naturally continue to the next iteration after executing the case block.

Consider removing the continue statement:

 case <-ticker.C:
     v.metrics.reportVersion(v.version)
-    continue

Line range hint 65-83: Consider adding error handling mechanism

The Start method currently always returns nil, which doesn't provide any feedback about potential issues during startup. Consider adding an error channel to communicate any errors that might occur in the goroutine back to the caller.

Here's a suggested implementation:

func (v *ReportingService) Start(ctx context.Context) error {
    ticker := time.NewTicker(v.reportingInterval)
    v.metrics.reportVersion(v.version)
    errCh := make(chan error, 1)
    go func() {
        defer ticker.Stop()
        defer close(errCh)
        for {
            select {
            case <-ticker.C:
                if err := v.metrics.reportVersion(v.version); err != nil {
                    errCh <- err
                    return
                }
            case <-ctx.Done():
                return
            }
        }
    }()
    return nil
}

This implementation allows for error propagation from the reportVersion method if needed. You might want to adjust the reportVersion method to return an error if it doesn't already.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4a76df8 and 9715e5d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • mod/execution/pkg/client/client.go (1 hunks)
  • mod/node-core/pkg/services/version/version.go (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
mod/execution/pkg/client/client.go (2)

Line range hint 1-214: Summary: Minor typographical correction enhances code quality.

The only change in this file is a small but valuable correction to a comment. This type of attention to detail contributes to maintaining a clean and professional codebase. No functional changes were made, and the overall structure and logic of the EngineClient remain unchanged.


101-101: Approved: Comment correction improves clarity.

The typographical error in the comment has been correctly fixed from "Clien" to "Client". This change enhances the readability and professionalism of the codebase.

Let's check for any other similar typographical errors in the comments:

✅ Verification successful

Verified: No additional typographical errors found in comments.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for potential typos in comments
rg --type go -i '//.*\b(clien|cient|cleint|clinet)\b' 

Length of output: 55

v.metrics.reportVersion(v.version)
go func() {
defer ticker.Stop()
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Ensure proper ticker cleanup in case of panic

Moving defer ticker.Stop() inside the goroutine ensures that the ticker continues running until the context is done. However, if the goroutine panics, the ticker might not be stopped properly. Consider adding a panic recovery mechanism to ensure the ticker is always stopped.

Here's a suggested implementation:

go func() {
    defer func() {
        ticker.Stop()
        if r := recover(); r != nil {
            v.logger.Error("Panic in version reporting goroutine", "recover", r)
        }
    }()
    for {
        select {
        case <-ticker.C:
            v.metrics.reportVersion(v.version)
        case <-ctx.Done():
            return
        }
    }
}()

v.metrics.reportVersion(v.version)
go func() {
defer ticker.Stop()
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is the fix. Ticker should be stopped in the goroutine. If not ticker will be stopped as soon as Start terminates and reportVersion will never be called.

@itsdevbear itsdevbear enabled auto-merge (squash) October 15, 2024 17:00
@itsdevbear itsdevbear merged commit 6697ddb into main Oct 15, 2024
16 checks passed
@itsdevbear itsdevbear deleted the eth-client-ticker-stop-2 branch October 15, 2024 17:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants