Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Custodians as stakeholders #32

Open
Giszmo opened this issue Nov 8, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Custodians as stakeholders #32

Giszmo opened this issue Nov 8, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@Giszmo
Copy link
Contributor

Giszmo commented Nov 8, 2024

Currently, "qualified custodians" are mentioned as often also being "economic nodes" but as "economic nodes" "have power and influence which is proportional to the frequency and volume of payments received." I wonder who has power from physically controlling bitcoins. You can slap that onto "economic nodes" but if you want to distinguish the non-custodial exchanges like Changelly from Coinbase who offer custody as a service, it might make sense to treat custodians as separate stakeholders.

@moneyball
Copy link
Member

Concept ACK

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants