Skip to content

Issues: bitcoin-cap/bcap

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

36 Open 10 Closed
36 Open 10 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

analyze scenario of US government having a significant SBR
#59 opened Dec 21, 2024 by moneyball
1
Write chapter to analyze what a quantum safe / emergency quantum break fork might look like
#58 opened Dec 14, 2024 by moneyball
3
Re: TOC – Discrepancy between content hierarchy in PDF and markdown versions
#51 opened Nov 19, 2024 by yashrajd
1
Misleading / incomplete definition of a soft fork
#48 opened Nov 17, 2024 by NORICVM
2
Add Developer Time Incentive for most groups
#47 opened Nov 14, 2024 by jimmysong
1
add presentation doc, links to where we have given presentation, podcast links to the project
#46 opened Nov 14, 2024 by moneyball
1
2
add BCAP non-goals to introduction
#45 opened Nov 14, 2024 by moneyball
Further considerations from crypto trading platforms with leverage
#44 opened Nov 11, 2024 by jonathanbier
3
missing speedy trial description in how changes are activated section
#40 opened Nov 8, 2024 by adamjonas
1
Risk of Developer Capture
#39 opened Nov 8, 2024 by BitcoinErrorLog
3
Add table of contents for markdown version
#38 opened Nov 8, 2024 by moneyball
Custodians as stakeholders
#32 opened Nov 8, 2024 by Giszmo
1
Confusing fork with activation date example
#31 opened Nov 7, 2024 by Giszmo
Soft Fork Risks underrepresented
#29 opened Nov 7, 2024 by BitcoinErrorLog
5
State of Mind vs Incentive-Driven Behavior
#28 opened Nov 7, 2024 by BitcoinErrorLog
1
Alternative Clients Portrayed too negatively
#27 opened Nov 7, 2024 by BitcoinErrorLog
4
Symptomatic, Market-Driven Approach not specified
#24 opened Nov 7, 2024 by BitcoinErrorLog
1
Misusing "Game Theory"
#23 opened Nov 7, 2024 by BitcoinErrorLog
2
Add hyperlinks to section 4.3 Determining Consensus
#21 opened Nov 7, 2024 by moneyball
Consider new framing for chain splits
#17 opened Nov 5, 2024 by moneyball
Add disincentives for each stakeholder group
#16 opened Nov 5, 2024 by moneyball
Estimate how many people are in each stakeholder group
#15 opened Nov 5, 2024 by moneyball
Elevate the footnote that there are no barriers to being a protocol developer into the main body
#14 opened Nov 5, 2024 by moneyball
Add column to Investor Segment table estimating % of coins owned by each segment
#13 opened Nov 5, 2024 by moneyball
Improve clarity on whether there are or can be non-contentious hard forks
#12 opened Nov 5, 2024 by moneyball
ProTip! Adding no:label will show everything without a label.