-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 210
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix: HTTPS monitors show HTTP on the table #1626 #1630
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested Reviewers
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview
1. Overview
1.1 PR Summary
- Business value and requirements alignment: The PR fixes an inconsistency in monitor type display, improving user experience and accuracy.
- Key components modified:
Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/index.jsx
- Impact assessment: The change affects the Uptime feature's monitor display, potentially increasing the number of displayed monitors and impacting performance.
- System dependencies and integration impacts: The change may impact other components that rely on monitor data fetched by the
fetchMonitors
function.
1.2 Architecture Changes
- System design modifications: None
- Component interactions: The change modifies the interaction between the client and the server, affecting the monitor data fetched and displayed.
- Integration points: The change affects the integration between the client and the server, specifically the
getMonitorsByTeamId
API call.
2. Detailed Technical Analysis
2.1 Code Logic Deep-Dive
Core Logic Changes
- Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/index.jsx -
fetchMonitors
function- Submitted PR Code:
const fetchMonitors = useCallback(async () => {
try {
setIsLoading(true);
const config = fetchParams;
const res = await networkService.getMonitorsByTeamId({
authToken: config.authToken,
teamId: config.teamId,
limit: 25,
types: ["http(s)", "ping", "docker", "port"],
page: config.page,
rowsPerPage: config.rowsPerPage,
filter: config.filter,
field: config.sort.field,
order: config.sort.order,
});
// ...
} catch (error) {
// ...
}
});
- Analysis:
- The
fetchMonitors
function fetches monitor data based on the provided types. The change adds "(s)" to the "http" type, indicating that both HTTP and HTTPS monitors should now be fetched. - Edge cases and error handling: The current implementation does not handle errors from the API call. If the API returns an error, the function will throw an unhandled promise rejection.
- Cross-component impact: The change may impact other components that rely on the monitor data fetched by this function.
- Business logic considerations: The change may impact the user interface and experience, as it may increase the number of monitors displayed.
- The
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
const fetchMonitors = useCallback(async () => {
try {
setIsLoading(true);
const config = fetchParams;
const res = await networkService.getMonitorsByTeamId({
authToken: config.authToken,
teamId: config.teamId,
limit: 25,
types: ["http(s)", "ping", "docker", "port"],
page: config.page,
rowsPerPage: config.rowsPerPage,
filter: config.filter,
field: config.sort.field,
order: config.sort.order,
}).catch((error) => {
// Handle API errors here
console.error("Error fetching monitors:", error);
throw error;
});
// ...
} catch (error) {
// ...
}
});
-
Improvement rationale:
- Technical benefits: Adding error handling to the API call prevents unhandled promise rejections and improves the overall stability of the application.
- Business value: Improved error handling ensures that users are not left with a broken UI when an API error occurs.
- Risk assessment: Without proper error handling, users may encounter unexpected behavior or errors, leading to a poor user experience.
-
Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/index.jsx -
getMonitorWithPercentage
function- Submitted PR Code:
const getMonitorWithPercentage = (monitor, theme) => {
// ...
const monitorType = monitor.type === "http(s)" ? "HTTP" : monitor.type.toUpperCase();
// ...
};
- Analysis:
- The
getMonitorWithPercentage
function is used to format monitor data for display. The change adds a check to display "HTTP" for "http(s)" monitor types. - Edge cases and error handling: The current implementation does not handle edge cases where the monitor type is not one of the expected types.
- Cross-component impact: The change may impact other components that rely on the formatted monitor data.
- Business logic considerations: The change ensures that the monitor type is displayed correctly for both HTTP and HTTPS monitors.
- The
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
const getMonitorWithPercentage = (monitor, theme) => {
// ...
let monitorType;
switch (monitor.type) {
case "http(s)":
monitorType = "HTTP";
break;
case "ping":
case "docker":
case "port":
monitorType = monitor.type.toUpperCase();
break;
default:
console.warn(`Unknown monitor type: ${monitor.type}`);
monitorType = monitor.type.toUpperCase();
}
// ...
};
- Improvement rationale:
- Technical benefits: Adding a switch statement to handle different monitor types improves code readability and maintainability.
- Business value: Proper handling of unknown monitor types prevents unexpected behavior and ensures that the UI remains consistent.
- Risk assessment: Without proper handling of unknown monitor types, the UI may display unexpected or incorrect data, leading to a poor user experience.
2.2 Implementation Quality
- Code organization and structure: The code is well-organized and follows a consistent structure, with clear separation of concerns.
- Design patterns usage: The code uses functional components and hooks, following modern React best practices.
- Error handling approach: The error handling in the
fetchMonitors
function can be improved, as discussed in the Code Logic Deep-Dive section. - Resource management: The component uses the
useCallback
hook to memoize thefetchMonitors
function, improving performance by avoiding unnecessary re-renders.
3. Critical Findings
3.1 Potential Issues
-
🔴 Critical Issues
- Impact: The change may increase the number of monitors fetched and displayed, potentially impacting performance, especially for teams with a large number of monitors.
- Recommendation: Conduct thorough performance testing to ensure that the application can handle the increased data load.
-
🟡 Warnings
- Warning: The current implementation does not handle errors from the API call in the
fetchMonitors
function. - Potential risks: Without proper error handling, users may encounter unexpected behavior or errors, leading to a poor user experience.
- Suggested improvements: Add error handling to the API call, as suggested in the Code Logic Deep-Dive section.
- Warning: The current implementation does not handle errors from the API call in the
3.2 Code Quality Concerns
- Maintainability aspects: The code is well-documented and follows a consistent coding style, making it easy to maintain.
- Readability issues: The code is easy to read and understand, with clear variable and function names.
- Performance bottlenecks: The change may introduce performance bottlenecks due to the increased data load, as discussed in the Potential Issues section.
4. Security Assessment
- Authentication/Authorization impacts: The change does not directly impact authentication or authorization.
- Data handling concerns: The change may increase the amount of data handled by the application, potentially impacting performance and security.
- Input validation: The change does not introduce new input validation concerns.
- Security best practices: The application follows security best practices, such as using HTTPS for communication with the server.
- Potential security risks: The increased data load may introduce performance or security risks, as discussed in the Potential Issues section.
- Mitigation strategies: Conduct thorough performance testing and monitor the application's performance in production to mitigate potential risks.
- Security testing requirements: Conduct security testing to ensure that the application remains secure after the change.
5. Testing Strategy
5.1 Test Coverage
- Unit test analysis: The component is covered by unit tests, ensuring that the individual components work as expected.
- Integration test requirements: Conduct integration tests to ensure that the component works correctly with other components and the server.
- Edge cases coverage: Test edge cases, such as teams with a large number of monitors or teams with only one type of monitor.
5.2 Test Recommendations
Suggested Test Cases
// Test case for edge case with a large number of monitors
it("should handle a large number of monitors", async () => {
// ...
const res = await networkService.getMonitorsByTeamId({
// ...
limit: 1000, // Increase the limit to simulate a large number of monitors
// ...
});
// ...
});
// Test case for edge case with only one type of monitor
it("should handle a team with only one type of monitor", async () => {
// ...
const res = await networkService.getMonitorsByTeamId({
// ...
types: ["http(s)"],
// ...
});
// ...
});
- Coverage improvements: Conduct thorough performance testing to ensure that the application can handle the increased data load.
- Performance testing needs: Conduct performance testing to ensure that the application remains performant after the change.
6. Documentation & Maintenance
- Documentation updates needed: Update the documentation to reflect the change in monitor types and the potential impact on performance.
- Long-term maintenance considerations: Monitor the application's performance in production to ensure that it remains performant and scalable.
- Technical debt and monitoring requirements: Conduct regular performance testing and monitoring to identify and address any performance issues that may arise.
7. Deployment & Operations
- Deployment impact and strategy: The change should be deployed as part of a regular release cycle, with thorough testing and monitoring to ensure a smooth deployment.
- Key operational considerations: Monitor the application's performance in production to ensure that it remains performant and scalable.
8. Summary & Recommendations
8.1 Key Action Items
- Critical changes required: Conduct thorough performance testing to ensure that the application can handle the increased data load.
- Important improvements suggested: Add error handling to the API call in the
fetchMonitors
function. - Best practices to implement: Follow security best practices, such as using HTTPS for communication with the server.
- Cross-cutting concerns to address: Monitor the application's performance in production to ensure that it remains performant and scalable.
8.2 Future Considerations
- Technical evolution path: As the application grows, consider implementing pagination or lazy loading to improve performance and scalability.
- Business capability evolution: As the application's user base grows, consider implementing features to support larger teams and more monitors.
- System integration impacts: As the application integrates with more systems, consider implementing features to support more monitor types and data sources.
💡 Help Shape LlamaPReview
How's this review format working for you? Vote in our Github Discussion Polls to help us improve your review experience!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The change here is incorrect and will break the database query.
The change you need to make for this PR is purely a UI change and not a functional change. Please see code review for details. Thanks!
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ const UptimeMonitors = () => { | |||
authToken: config.authToken, | |||
teamId: config.teamId, | |||
limit: 25, | |||
types: ["http", "ping", "docker", "port"], | |||
types: ["http(s)", "ping", "docker", "port"], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is not the correct place to change this, this is specifying what monitors are returned from the backend. It will also be rejected by backend request validation as it is not a valid type.
As I mentioned there is no "http(s)" or "https" type of monitor.
The place you want to change this is in the sepcific row's render function of the UptimeDataTabe. It's purely a presentational change, not functional.
Please not there is a new PR open that refactors the Uptime Monitor page which includeds the UptimeDataTable component. My advice would be to base your PR off of that branch, or alternatively wait until that PR is merged into develop before opening a PR.
Also please make sure to actually run your code and verify results before submitting a PR
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thankyou for the feedback. I apologise for quickly jumping the gun. I will make the said changes and wait for the that PR to get merged.
Co-authored-by: Mert Şişmanoğlu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Mert Şişmanoğlu <[email protected]>
…heckmate into fix/fe/uptime-http
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/Components/Host/index.jsx (1)
Line range hint
56-61
: Lose yourself in the PropTypes - percentage should be a number!The percentage prop is defined as a string but it's used in a mathematical context with the % symbol.
Host.propTypes = { title: PropTypes.string, percentageColor: PropTypes.string, - percentage: PropTypes.string, + percentage: PropTypes.number, url: PropTypes.string, };
🧹 Nitpick comments (15)
Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/Components/StatusBoxes/statusBox.jsx (4)
4-6
: Yo dawg, these import paths are deeper than mom's spaghetti! 🍝Consider using path aliases to make these imports more maintainable. Instead of:
import Arrow from "../../../../../assets/icons/top-right-arrow.svg?react";You could use something like:
import Arrow from "@assets/icons/top-right-arrow.svg?react";
Line range hint
13-39
: Knees weak, arms heavy, but this icon logic is ready! 🎯The conditional icon rendering works well, but we could make it even cleaner using an object map:
- let icon; - if (title === "up") { - color = theme.palette.success.lowContrast; - icon = ( - <Box sx={{ ...sharedStyles, top: 8 }}> - <Arrow /> - </Box> - ); - } else if... + const STATUS_CONFIG = { + up: { + color: theme.palette.success.lowContrast, + icon: <Box sx={{ ...sharedStyles, top: 8 }}><Arrow /></Box> + }, + down: { + color: theme.palette.error.lowContrast, + icon: <Box sx={{ ...sharedStyles, transform: "rotate(180deg)", top: 5 }}><Arrow /></Box> + }, + paused: { + color: theme.palette.warning.lowContrast, + icon: <Box sx={{ ...sharedStyles, top: 12, right: 12 }}><ClockSnooze /></Box> + } + }; + const { color, icon } = STATUS_CONFIG[title];
55-61
: There's vomit on his sweater already, but this background's steady! 🎨The fixed positioning with percentages might cause issues on different screen sizes. Consider using responsive values:
- top="-10%" - left="5%" + sx={{ + position: "absolute", + top: { xs: "-15%", sm: "-10%", md: "-8%" }, + left: { xs: "2%", sm: "5%", md: "5%" } + }}
76-96
: Lost yourself in the typography, but here's your one shot! 🎤The hardcoded font sizes could be replaced with MUI's typography system for better consistency:
- fontSize={36} - fontWeight={600} + variant="h1" + fontWeight="bold" - fontSize={20} - fontWeight={300} + variant="h4" + fontWeight="light"Also, consider adding an aria-label to improve accessibility for screen readers:
+ aria-label={`${title} monitors count: ${value}`}
Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/Components/Host/index.jsx (2)
Line range hint
1-16
: Yo dawg, let's update that documentation to reflect the HTTP/HTTPS situation!The JSDoc needs to be updated to mention that the URL parameter can contain both HTTP and HTTPS protocols, which is crucial for the fix we're implementing.
* @param {Object} params - An object containing the following properties: - * @param {string} params.url - The URL of the host. + * @param {string} params.url - The URL of the host (supports both HTTP and HTTPS protocols).
30-52
: Straight outta MUI - let's keep our styling consistent!The styling approach is all over the place like loose spaghetti. We should stick to MUI's
sx
prop for consistency:- <span - style={{ - content: '""', - width: "4px", - height: "4px", - borderRadius: "50%", - backgroundColor: "gray", - opacity: 0.8, - }} - /> + <Box + sx={{ + content: '""', + width: "4px", + height: "4px", + borderRadius: "50%", + bgcolor: "gray", + opacity: 0.8, + }} + /> - <span style={{ opacity: 0.6 }}>{url}</span> + <Typography + sx={{ + opacity: 0.6 + }} + > + {url} + </Typography>Client/src/Components/CircularCount/index.jsx (1)
7-22
: Accessibility improvements needed for our friends up north!The circular count display should have proper ARIA attributes for screen readers.
Here's a suggestion to make it more accessible:
<Box component="span" + role="status" + aria-label={`Count: ${count}`} color={theme.palette.tertiary.contrastText} border={2} borderColor={theme.palette.accent.main} backgroundColor={theme.palette.tertiary.main} sx={{ padding: ".25em .75em", borderRadius: "50%", fontSize: "12px", fontWeight: 500, }} >Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/Components/StatusBoxes/index.jsx (2)
9-9
: Careful with that Skeleton import, it's slippery like ice!The component assumes
SkeletonLayout
will always load successfully. We should add error handling, eh?Here's a suggestion using React.Suspense and error boundaries:
+ import { Suspense } from 'react'; + const SkeletonFallback = () => <div>Loading...</div>; - if (!shouldRender) return <SkeletonLayout shouldRender={shouldRender} />; + if (!shouldRender) { + return ( + <Suspense fallback={<SkeletonFallback />}> + <SkeletonLayout shouldRender={shouldRender} /> + </Suspense> + ); + }
11-15
: Beauty spacing there, but let's make it responsive!The Stack's gap might be too large on smaller screens.
Here's how to make it more responsive:
<Stack - gap={theme.spacing(8)} + gap={{ + xs: theme.spacing(2), + sm: theme.spacing(4), + md: theme.spacing(8) + }} direction="row" justifyContent="space-between" >Client/src/Components/StatBox/index.jsx (1)
Line range hint
73-73
: Mom's spaghetti alert! 🍝 These TODOs need attention.There are two TODO comments about styling that should be addressed:
- Questioning the use of both
width
andminWidth
- Font size should come from theme
These styling inconsistencies could lead to maintenance headaches later.
Would you like me to propose a solution for these styling issues? I can help refactor this to follow better theme practices.
Also applies to: 83-83
Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/Components/UptimeDataTable/index.jsx (2)
22-48
: Solid structure with a subtle swirl of functionality.The
MonitorDataTable
component is nicely contained and the usage ofLoadingSpinner
plus theemptyView
fallback shows a thoughtful approach. Consider using a more self-descriptive name forshouldRender
(e.g.isVisible
) to increase clarity and reduce confusion if knees get weak in future maintenance.
210-210
: Wipe away the splashes ofconsole.log
.Line 210 logs “rendering” to the console, which is generally fine in development. However, you may want to remove it before shipping for a clean final product—no need to leave any trace of sweaty palms.
- console.log("rendering"); + // console.log("rendering"); // comment out or remove in production[lit the stage with a nitpick], but recommended for a neat release.
Also applies to: 223-225, 231-238
Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/Components/UptimeDataTable/skeleton.jsx (1)
4-19
: Simple yet effective skeleton.
UptimeDataTableSkeleton
judiciously shows or hides the loading placeholder based onshouldRender
. The usage ofSkeleton
with 100% width/height is well-aligned with typical layout patterns. If your stomach churns for advanced styling or transitions, consider adding MUI’sanimation
prop.Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/Components/SearchComponent/index.jsx (1)
22-26
: Yo dawg, let's make this search box more responsive! 📱The hardcoded width of 25% with a minimum width of 150px might not provide the best experience across all screen sizes.
Consider using Material-UI's responsive breakpoints:
- width="25%" - minWidth={150} + sx={{ + width: { + xs: '100%', + sm: '50%', + md: '25%', + }, + minWidth: 150, + }}Server/db/mongo/modules/monitorModule.js (1)
852-869
: Yo, these commented-out values are just taking up space! 🗑️Remove the commented-out example values at the end of the file.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (25)
Client/src/Components/CircularCount/index.jsx
(1 hunks)Client/src/Components/StatBox/index.jsx
(1 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/Details/index.jsx
(1 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/index.jsx
(2 hunks)Client/src/Pages/PageSpeed/Configure/index.jsx
(1 hunks)Client/src/Pages/PageSpeed/Details/index.jsx
(1 hunks)Client/src/Pages/PageSpeed/card.jsx
(1 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Details/index.jsx
(1 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/Components/ActionsMenu/index.jsx
(1 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/Components/Host/index.jsx
(2 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/Components/LoadingSpinner/index.jsx
(1 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/Components/SearchComponent/index.jsx
(1 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/Components/StatusBoxes/index.jsx
(1 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/Components/StatusBoxes/skeleton.jsx
(1 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/Components/StatusBoxes/statusBox.jsx
(2 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/Components/UptimeDataTable/index.jsx
(5 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/Components/UptimeDataTable/skeleton.jsx
(1 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/Hooks/useDebounce.jsx
(1 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/Hooks/useMonitorFetch.jsx
(1 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/UptimeDataTable/Skeleton/index.jsx
(0 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/fallback.jsx
(0 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/index.css
(0 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/index.jsx
(2 hunks)Server/controllers/monitorController.js
(1 hunks)Server/db/mongo/modules/monitorModule.js
(4 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
- Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/index.css
- Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/UptimeDataTable/Skeleton/index.jsx
- Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/fallback.jsx
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (8)
- Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/Details/index.jsx
- Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/Components/StatusBoxes/skeleton.jsx
- Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Details/index.jsx
- Server/controllers/monitorController.js
- Client/src/Pages/PageSpeed/card.jsx
- Client/src/Pages/PageSpeed/Configure/index.jsx
- Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/index.jsx
- Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/Components/ActionsMenu/index.jsx
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/index.jsx
🔇 Additional comments (9)
Client/src/Components/StatBox/index.jsx (1)
4-4
: Yo, let's verify this import path change!The import path has been updated, but we should verify it's consistent across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Yo, the import path is straight fire! 🔥
All active imports of
useUtils
are consistently using the new path pattern from the Hooks directory. We're good to go!🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any remaining old import paths rg "import.*useUtils.*from.*['\"].*Uptime/utils['\"]" --type js --type jsxLength of output: 108
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Add JSX file type and search for both old and new import patterns rg --type-add 'jsx:*.jsx' --type-add 'jsx:*.tsx' \ --type js --type jsx \ "import.*useUtils.*from" -A 1Length of output: 1737
Client/src/Pages/PageSpeed/Details/index.jsx (2)
Line range hint
31-31
: Heads up! Let's verify status message handling.The
determineState
andstatusColor
usage here might need adjustment to properly handle HTTPS monitors.
22-22
: Hold up! We need to check the useUtils implementation!This component relies on
statusColor
andpagespeedStatusMsg
from useUtils for status display. Since the PR aims to fix HTTPS display issues, we should verify the implementation.Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/Components/UptimeDataTable/index.jsx (4)
3-15
: Stay steady, keep code tidy.Great job keeping the imports organized and referencing only what's needed. This prevents confusion and leaves no messy sauce on the code.
80-101
: Eminently maintainable local state usage.You've introduced
isSearching
in local state, which is easy to understand. Just keep in mind that if your arms grow heavy, you may need central state if searching logic expands across multiple components. For now, this approach is concise and effective.
244-251
: Unused props keep the sauce simmering.
debouncedSearch
andonSearchChange
still appear inpropTypes
despite not being used. This can cause confusion if your mind is racing. Give them a thorough re-check and remove if no longer needed.
263-263
: Clean final export.The default export structure is consistent and logically placed—easy to find and ready to serve whenever required.
Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/Hooks/useDebounce.jsx (1)
3-16
: Lean and mean custom hook.The
useDebounce
hook is straightforward and efficient. The cleanup usingclearTimeout(handler)
helps prevent memory leaks if code changes mid-flow like a quick freestyle. Great job!Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/Components/LoadingSpinner/index.jsx (1)
1-46
: Yo, this LoadingSpinner component is straight fire! 🔥Clean implementation with proper prop validation, theme integration, and performance optimization through early returns.
const theme = useTheme(); | ||
console.log(url, title); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Mom's spaghetti alert! 🍝 Debug code detected!
Remove the console.log statement before it ends up in production, fam!
const theme = useTheme();
- console.log(url, title);
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
const theme = useTheme(); | |
console.log(url, title); | |
const theme = useTheme(); |
</> | ||
)} | ||
</Stack> | ||
<span style={{ opacity: 0.6 }}>{url}</span> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Opportunity's knocking - we're missing the protocol fix!
The PR's main objective is to fix HTTPS monitors showing as HTTP, but I don't see any changes addressing this. We should modify how the URL is displayed to properly indicate the protocol.
- <span style={{ opacity: 0.6 }}>{url}</span>
+ <Typography
+ component="span"
+ sx={{ opacity: 0.6 }}
+ >
+ {url.replace(/^https?:\/\//, 'http(s)://')}
+ </Typography>
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
<span style={{ opacity: 0.6 }}>{url}</span> | |
<Typography | |
component="span" | |
sx={{ opacity: 0.6 }} | |
> | |
{url.replace(/^https?:\/\//, 'http(s)://')} | |
</Typography> |
CircularCount.propTypes = { | ||
count: PropTypes.number, | ||
}; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Yo, the PropTypes validation needs to be stronger, eh!
The count
prop should be marked as required since it's essential for the component to function properly.
Here's how to fix it, buddy:
CircularCount.propTypes = {
- count: PropTypes.number,
+ count: PropTypes.number.isRequired,
};
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
CircularCount.propTypes = { | |
count: PropTypes.number, | |
}; | |
CircularCount.propTypes = { | |
count: PropTypes.number.isRequired, | |
}; |
StatusBoxes.propTypes = { | ||
monitorsSummary: PropTypes.object.isRequired, | ||
}; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Eh, the PropTypes are looking a bit thin there, bud!
The component's missing PropTypes validation for the shouldRender
prop, and monitorsSummary
shape isn't specific enough.
Here's how to beef it up:
StatusBoxes.propTypes = {
+ shouldRender: PropTypes.bool.isRequired,
- monitorsSummary: PropTypes.object.isRequired,
+ monitorsSummary: PropTypes.shape({
+ upMonitors: PropTypes.number,
+ downMonitors: PropTypes.number,
+ pausedMonitors: PropTypes.number
+ }).isRequired,
};
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
StatusBoxes.propTypes = { | |
monitorsSummary: PropTypes.object.isRequired, | |
}; | |
StatusBoxes.propTypes = { | |
shouldRender: PropTypes.bool.isRequired, | |
monitorsSummary: PropTypes.shape({ | |
upMonitors: PropTypes.number, | |
downMonitors: PropTypes.number, | |
pausedMonitors: PropTypes.number | |
}).isRequired, | |
}; |
return { | ||
id: monitor._id, | ||
name: monitor.name, | ||
url: monitor.url, | ||
title: monitor.name, | ||
percentage: uptimePercentage, | ||
percentageColor, | ||
monitor: monitor, | ||
}; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yo, we need to show that HTTPS swag! 🔒
The monitor data processing doesn't handle the protocol display issue mentioned in the PR objective (#1626).
Add protocol handling to the monitor object:
return {
id: monitor._id,
name: monitor.name,
url: monitor.url,
title: monitor.name,
+ protocol: monitor.url?.startsWith('https://') ? 'HTTPS' : 'HTTP',
percentage: uptimePercentage,
percentageColor,
monitor: monitor,
};
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
return { | |
id: monitor._id, | |
name: monitor.name, | |
url: monitor.url, | |
title: monitor.name, | |
percentage: uptimePercentage, | |
percentageColor, | |
monitor: monitor, | |
}; | |
return { | |
id: monitor._id, | |
name: monitor.name, | |
url: monitor.url, | |
title: monitor.name, | |
protocol: monitor.url?.startsWith('https://') ? 'HTTPS' : 'HTTP', | |
percentage: uptimePercentage, | |
percentageColor, | |
monitor: monitor, | |
}; |
@@ -497,7 +497,7 @@ const getMonitorById = async (monitorId) => { | |||
|
|||
const getMonitorsByTeamId = async (req) => { | |||
let { limit, type, page, rowsPerPage, filter, field, order } = req.query; | |||
|
|||
console.log("req.query", req.query); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yo, these console.logs gonna leak into prod! 🚫
Debug logging statements should not be committed to production code.
Remove all console.log statements or replace them with proper logging:
- console.log("req.query", req.query);
- console.log("limit", limit);
- console.log("page", page);
- console.log("rowsPerPage", rowsPerPage);
- console.log("filter", filter);
- console.log("field", field);
- console.log("order", order);
- console.log("skip", skip);
- console.log("sort", sort);
- console.log("filteredMonitors", filteredMonitors);
+ logger.debug('Processing monitor query', {
+ query: req.query,
+ pagination: { limit, page, rowsPerPage },
+ sorting: { field, order },
+ filtering: { filter },
+ });
Also applies to: 517-524, 686-686
Describe your changes
Added http(s) to convey that these monitors are performing checks via http/https protocol.
Issue number
Issue Number addressed: #1626
Please ensure all items are checked off before requesting a review: