Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

don't show location on incidents page if it'd be "(?:?@)" #1362

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 5, 2024

Conversation

srabraham
Copy link
Member

@srabraham srabraham commented Nov 4, 2024

The Rod Garett-style addresses are often left empty in practice, when they're irrelevant (e.g. Gerlach, or Black Rock Station, or unknown). It's kind of an eyesore to see those displayed as "(?:?@)" in the incidents table. Before and after example pics are below.

image image

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 4, 2024

⚠️ Optional matrix job Py:3.14.0-alpha.1 - ubuntu-latest failed ⚠️

  • tox prefix: test
  • exit status: 1

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 4, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 69.18%. Comparing base (0d48628) to head (9ffecce).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1362   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   69.18%   69.18%           
=======================================
  Files         181      181           
  Lines        8894     8894           
  Branches     1488     1488           
=======================================
  Hits         6153     6153           
  Misses       2641     2641           
  Partials      100      100           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

The Rod Garett-style addresses are often left empty in practice, since
they're often not relevant (e.g. Gerlach, or Black Rock Station, or
unknown). It's kind of an eyesore to see those displayed as "(?:?@)"
in the incidents table.
@srabraham srabraham force-pushed the 2024-11-04-location-formatting branch from 00d7fd9 to 9ffecce Compare November 5, 2024 11:54
@srabraham srabraham enabled auto-merge (rebase) November 5, 2024 11:54
@srabraham srabraham merged commit 24b17b5 into master Nov 5, 2024
11 checks passed
@srabraham srabraham deleted the 2024-11-04-location-formatting branch November 5, 2024 12:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant