Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adds option to use preemtible instances #1

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Adds option to use preemtible instances #1

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

halfdanrump
Copy link

See dask#55

This PR is a very simple fix. There's no handling of the event that an instance is pre-empted. So using this option is of course on the user's own risk. But I think it's OK, since people who know about preemptible VMs also knows the risks.

@halfdanrump
Copy link
Author

Ugh sorry, seems like I forked from the wrong repo....

@ckemere
Copy link
Owner

ckemere commented Oct 16, 2017

Yep - dask/dask-kubernetes is the master

@halfdanrump
Copy link
Author

@ckemere Yep, but my search engine brought me here for some reason, and I didn't look too closely before forking 😆

By the way, some of the commits you did sound pretty important (jupyter notebook HTTPS and security fixes). Any plans of merging into dask/dask-kubernetes?

@ckemere
Copy link
Owner

ckemere commented Oct 17, 2017

The patch I made doesn't actually make things that much more secure, as you have to click past an unsigned certificate. So probably not great for production. The jupyter-stacks (which is where I got it from) have a more complex setup with various command line options to enable different features. I'll post an issue and see if the dask folks want to enable it.

@halfdanrump
Copy link
Author

Yeah, that'd be great :). I just assumed that everything was working securely out of the box, but now I'm not sure if I can use this tool to handle sensitive data.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants