Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[pre-commit.ci] pre-commit autoupdate #27

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 7, 2024
Merged

Conversation

pre-commit-ci[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@pre-commit-ci pre-commit-ci bot commented Oct 7, 2024

updates:

Summary by Sourcery

Update the pre-commit hook version to v5.0.0 to ensure the latest checks and improvements are applied.

Build:

  • Update pre-commit hook version from v4.6.0 to v5.0.0 in the .pre-commit-config.yaml file.

updates:
- [github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit-hooks: v4.6.0 → v5.0.0](pre-commit/pre-commit-hooks@v4.6.0...v5.0.0)
Copy link

Review changes with SemanticDiff.

Copy link

sourcery-ai bot commented Oct 7, 2024

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request updates the pre-commit hooks version from v4.6.0 to v5.0.0 in the .pre-commit-config.yaml file. The update is automatically generated by the pre-commit.ci service.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Update pre-commit hooks version
  • Change the 'rev' field from v4.6.0 to v5.0.0 for the pre-commit-hooks repository
.pre-commit-config.yaml

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
    this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have skipped reviewing this pull request. It seems to have been created by a bot (hey, pre-commit-ci[bot]!). We assume it knows what it's doing!

Copy link

codiumai-pr-agent-free bot commented Oct 7, 2024

CI Failure Feedback 🧐

(Checks updated until commit 5f32ec8)

Action: Awesome_Lint

Failed stage: Run npx awesome-lint [❌]

Failed test name: remark-lint:awesome-list-item

Failure summary:

The action failed due to multiple linting errors detected by remark-lint:awesome-list-item:

  • Several list item descriptions did not start with valid casing.
  • At least one list item description did not end with proper punctuation.
  • A total of 47 errors were found, leading to the process exiting with code 1.

  • Relevant error logs:
    1:  ##[group]Operating System
    2:  Ubuntu
    ...
    
    545:  ✖  220:44   List item description must start with valid casing      remark-lint:awesome-list-item
    546:  ✖  221:64   List item description must start with valid casing      remark-lint:awesome-list-item
    547:  ✖  222:57   List item description must start with valid casing      remark-lint:awesome-list-item
    548:  ✖  223:55   List item description must start with valid casing      remark-lint:awesome-list-item
    549:  ✖  224:54   List item description must start with valid casing      remark-lint:awesome-list-item
    550:  ✖  228:63   List item description must start with valid casing      remark-lint:awesome-list-item
    551:  ✖  231:71   List item description must start with valid casing      remark-lint:awesome-list-item
    552:  ✖  240:103  List item description must end with proper punctuation  remark-lint:awesome-list-item
    553:  47 errors
    554:  ##[error]Process completed with exit code 1.
    

    ✨ CI feedback usage guide:

    The CI feedback tool (/checks) automatically triggers when a PR has a failed check.
    The tool analyzes the failed checks and provides several feedbacks:

    • Failed stage
    • Failed test name
    • Failure summary
    • Relevant error logs

    In addition to being automatically triggered, the tool can also be invoked manually by commenting on a PR:

    /checks "https://github.com/{repo_name}/actions/runs/{run_number}/job/{job_number}"
    

    where {repo_name} is the name of the repository, {run_number} is the run number of the failed check, and {job_number} is the job number of the failed check.

    Configuration options

    • enable_auto_checks_feedback - if set to true, the tool will automatically provide feedback when a check is failed. Default is true.
    • excluded_checks_list - a list of checks to exclude from the feedback, for example: ["check1", "check2"]. Default is an empty list.
    • enable_help_text - if set to true, the tool will provide a help message with the feedback. Default is true.
    • persistent_comment - if set to true, the tool will overwrite a previous checks comment with the new feedback. Default is true.
    • final_update_message - if persistent_comment is true and updating a previous checks message, the tool will also create a new message: "Persistent checks updated to latest commit". Default is true.

    See more information about the checks tool in the docs.

    @cleder cleder merged commit 388a9ad into main Oct 7, 2024
    5 of 9 checks passed
    @cleder cleder deleted the pre-commit-ci-update-config branch October 7, 2024 18:19
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    None yet
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    1 participant