[pre-commit.ci] pre-commit autoupdate

[pre-commit-ci]

updates:

• github.com/jackdewinter/pymarkdown: v0.9.26 → v0.9.27

Summary by Sourcery

Build:

• Update pre-commit hooks to use PyMarkdown v0.9.27.

[semanticdiff-com]

Review changes with  

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request updates the pymarkdown pre-commit hook to v0.9.27.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Update pymarkdown pre-commit hook	Update pymarkdown version from v0.9.26 to v0.9.27	.pre-commit-config.yaml

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
  this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

We have skipped reviewing this pull request. It seems to have been created by a bot (hey, pre-commit-ci[bot]!). We assume it knows what it's doing!

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

CI Failure Feedback 🧐

(Checks updated until commit 38a940a)

Action: Awesome_Lint

Failed stage: Run npx awesome-lint [❌]

Failed test name: remark-lint:awesome-list-item

Failure summary: The action failed due to multiple markdown linting errors in the awesome-list: 46 instances of incorrect casing at the start of list item descriptions 1 instance of improper punctuation at the end of a list item The errors were detected by the remark-lint:awesome-list-item checker These formatting issues violate the style guidelines for awesome-list entries

Relevant error logs: 1: ##[group]Operating System 2: Ubuntu ... 563: ✖ 229:44 List item description must start with valid casing remark-lint:awesome-list-item 564: ✖ 230:64 List item description must start with valid casing remark-lint:awesome-list-item 565: ✖ 231:57 List item description must start with valid casing remark-lint:awesome-list-item 566: ✖ 232:55 List item description must start with valid casing remark-lint:awesome-list-item 567: ✖ 233:54 List item description must start with valid casing remark-lint:awesome-list-item 568: ✖ 237:63 List item description must start with valid casing remark-lint:awesome-list-item 569: ✖ 240:71 List item description must start with valid casing remark-lint:awesome-list-item 570: ✖ 249:103 List item description must end with proper punctuation remark-lint:awesome-list-item 571: 47 errors 572: ##[error]Process completed with exit code 1.

---

✨ CI feedback usage guide:

---

The CI feedback tool (/checks) automatically triggers when a PR has a failed check.
The tool analyzes the failed checks and provides several feedbacks:

• Failed stage
• Failed test name
• Failure summary
• Relevant error logs

In addition to being automatically triggered, the tool can also be invoked manually by commenting on a PR:

/checks "https://github.com/{repo_name}/actions/runs/{run_number}/job/{job_number}"

where {repo_name} is the name of the repository, {run_number} is the run number of the failed check, and {job_number} is the job number of the failed check.

Configuration options

• enable_auto_checks_feedback - if set to true, the tool will automatically provide feedback when a check is failed. Default is true.
• excluded_checks_list - a list of checks to exclude from the feedback, for example: ["check1", "check2"]. Default is an empty list.
• enable_help_text - if set to true, the tool will provide a help message with the feedback. Default is true.
• persistent_comment - if set to true, the tool will overwrite a previous checks comment with the new feedback. Default is true.
• final_update_message - if persistent_comment is true and updating a previous checks message, the tool will also create a new message: "Persistent checks updated to latest commit". Default is true.

See more information about the checks tool in the docs.

[llamapreview]

Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview

Review Status: Automated Review Skipped

Dear contributor,

Thank you for your Pull Request. LlamaPReview has analyzed your changes and determined that this PR does not require an automated code review.

Analysis Result:

PR only contains version updates and formatting changes

Technical Context:

Version and formatting changes detected, which include:

• Package version updates
• Dependency version changes
• Code formatting adjustments
• Whitespace modifications
• Structural formatting changes

We're continuously improving our PR analysis capabilities. Have thoughts on when and how LlamaPReview should perform automated reviews? Share your insights in our GitHub Discussions.

Best regards,
LlamaPReview Team