Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade com.squareup.retrofit2:converter-gson from 2.9.0 to 2.11.0 #108

Closed

Conversation

ishaileshmishra
Copy link
Member

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to upgrade com.squareup.retrofit2:converter-gson from 2.9.0 to 2.11.0.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 2 versions ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released 22 days ago, on 2024-03-28.

The recommended version fixes:

Severity Issue PriorityScore (*) Exploit Maturity
Deserialization of Untrusted Data
SNYK-JAVA-COMGOOGLECODEGSON-1730327
539/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 6.5
No Known Exploit

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

@ishaileshmishra ishaileshmishra requested a review from a team as a code owner April 20, 2024 05:17
Copy link

We regret to inform you that you are currently not able to merge your changes into the master branch due to restrictions applied by our SRE team. To proceed with merging your changes, we kindly request that you create a pull request from the next branch. Our team will then review the changes and work with you to ensure a successful merge into the master branch.

@harshithad0703
Copy link
Contributor

upgraded in #115

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants