Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependencies #1

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 29, 2017
Merged

Update dependencies #1

merged 4 commits into from
Jun 29, 2017

Conversation

masonlouchart
Copy link
Contributor

This commit sets the minimal requirement of Polymer to the version 1.9
(instead of the 1.4).

This commit sets the minimal requirement of Polymer to the version 1.9
(instead of the 1.4).
Before this commit the element was using dependencies themself only
usable with Polymer 1. Now, the element can use dependencies using
Polymer 2.
Since the element is hybrid, when it uses Polymer 2 the demo page is
broken. It seems this is a known issue related to the [iron-demo-helpers](PolymerElements/iron-demo-helpers#54).
@masonlouchart
Copy link
Contributor Author

There's still an issue with the demo page. The demo is working but the snippet is not visible.

Ref: PolymerElements/iron-demo-helpers#54

@sbeleidy
Copy link
Member

Can you also update the version number so after merging we can push a release?

@masonlouchart
Copy link
Contributor Author

Usually I prefer merge the PRs before make a new release. It avoids to create the release with a merge commit and it ensure the version number is always incremented from the master branch.

All this is depending your Git strategy, so I'll follow yours.

- make the element hybrid
@masonlouchart
Copy link
Contributor Author

Please tell me if I did something wrong or not following your habits.

@sbeleidy
Copy link
Member

Either way works I just figured this would be easier. I assumed this would be the only thing for the next release so why not.

@sbeleidy
Copy link
Member

Should we wait for the fix in the demo or just merge this so login-fire can use it? What do you think?

@masonlouchart
Copy link
Contributor Author

masonlouchart commented Jun 23, 2017

Because the release is ready we can merge.

Moreover, the issue seems known and not coming from our element. The element is pretty simple, an snippet inside the documentation would be enough for now. Of course, we have to fix it relatively quickly.

NB: the priority for me is the login-fire element

@masonlouchart masonlouchart merged commit bc0bc75 into master Jun 29, 2017
@masonlouchart masonlouchart deleted the update-dependencies branch June 29, 2017 08:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants