no need for BCP14 #43
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Thomas Fossati <[email protected]>
|
@thomas-fossati Looks good, but in addition we have to remove the line: Because the answer we chose is 'no' - so let's not keep this comment. Just to be sure I checked BCP14 and I believe the answer is that we don't need BCP14 language for this. Also RFC 7252 doesn't use BCP14 words in this way; it's just "must" to define procedures that experts/IANA follow. |
EskoDijk
approved these changes
Feb 19, 2025
Signed-off-by: Thomas Fossati <[email protected]>
Agree. Done in 7d2a1a4 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix #42