Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: typos in documentation files #3461

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

fix: typos in documentation files #3461

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
dd32210
Update adr-001-interchain-accounts.md
vtjl10 Dec 22, 2024
ecf31fe
Merge branch 'cosmos:main' into main
vtjl10 Jan 1, 2025
fef5de4
Merge branch 'main' into main
vtjl10 Jan 9, 2025
2d2c20e
Merge branch 'cosmos:main' into main
vtjl10 Jan 15, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions docs/docs/architecture/adr/adr-001-interchain-accounts.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ The hub can be used trustlessly as a host chain in the configuration of Intercha

## Consequences

There has been preliminary work done to understand if this increases any security feature of the Cosmos Hub. One thought was that this capability is similar to contract to contract interactions which are possible on virtual machine blockchains like EVM chains. Those interactions introduced a new attack vector, called a re-entrancy bug, which was the culprit of "The DAO hack on Ethereum". We believe there is no risk of these kinds of attacks with Interchain Accounts because they require the interactions to be atomic and Interchain Accounts are asynchronous.
There has been preliminary work done to understand if this increases any security feature of the Cosmos Hub. One thought was that this capability is similar to contract interactions which are possible on virtual machine blockchains like EVM chains. Those interactions introduced a new attack vector, called a re-entrancy bug, which was the culprit of "The DAO hack on Ethereum". We believe there is no risk of these kinds of attacks with Interchain Accounts because they require the interactions to be atomic and Interchain Accounts are asynchronous.

#### Backwards Compatibility

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -91,4 +91,4 @@ There are future releases of Interchain Accounts which are expected to be backwa
## Additional Research & References

- [Why Interchain Accounts Change Everything for Cosmos Interoperability](https://medium.com/chainapsis/why-interchain-accounts-change-everything-for-cosmos-interoperability-59c19032bf11)
- [Interchain Account Auth Module Demo Repo](https://github.com/cosmos/interchain-accounts)
- [Interchain Account Auth Module Demo Repo](https://github.com/cosmos/interchain-accounts)