Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: use errors.New to replace fmt.Errorf with no parameters #1015

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 12, 2024

Conversation

RiceChuan
Copy link
Contributor

@RiceChuan RiceChuan commented Dec 12, 2024

use errors.New to replace fmt.Errorf with no parameters

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling for missing node keys and unexpected nodes.
    • Enhanced validation for storage version management.
  • New Features

    • Added new test cases for robust storage version management.
    • Introduced benchmarking functions for performance measurement.
  • Tests

    • Refined assertions and validations in test cases.
    • Added concurrency tests to ensure proper behavior during simultaneous operations.

@RiceChuan RiceChuan requested a review from a team as a code owner December 12, 2024 04:18
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 12, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on enhancing error handling within the nodedb.go and nodedb_test.go files. In nodedb.go, error messages have been simplified by replacing formatted errors with standard error instantiations using errors.New. The nodedb_test.go file has been updated with new test cases, refined assertions, and benchmarking functions to improve the validation of error handling and storage version management. Overall, the modifications aim to standardize error handling practices and enhance the robustness of the nodeDB functionality.

Changes

File Change Summary
nodedb.go - Updated GetFastNode method error handling to use errors.New.
- Changed ErrNodeMissingNodeKey to use errors.New.
nodedb_test.go - Modified traverseNodes error handling to use errors.New.
- Added/modified test cases for storage version management.
- Introduced benchmarking functions: BenchmarkNodeKey and BenchmarkTreeString.
- Refined assertions for expected outcomes.
- Added concurrency test TestDeleteVersionsFromNoDeadlock.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • cool-develope
  • tac0turtle
  • yihuang

🐇 In the code where errors lay,
A hop to fix them, come what may.
With errors.New, we simplify,
In tests and nodes, we reach for the sky!
So let’s refine and make it bright,
A rabbit’s joy in code’s delight! 🐇


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
nodedb.go (1)

207-207: Consider simplifying the error message for clarity

The error message can be made more concise and informative. Consider simplifying it as follows:

-return nil, errors.New("nodeDB.GetFastNode() requires key, len(key) equals 0")
+return nil, errors.New("key cannot be empty")
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 456159f and 66efdec.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • nodedb.go (2 hunks)
  • nodedb_test.go (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
nodedb_test.go (1)

281-281: Change aligns with PR objectives to simplify error creation

The error handling correctly replaces fmt.Errorf(...) with errors.New(...) for creating a simple error message without parameters.

nodedb.go (1)

1341-1341: Change aligns with PR objectives to simplify error creation

Replaced fmt.Errorf(...) with errors.New(...) for a simple error message, consistent with the PR objectives.

Copy link
Member

@julienrbrt julienrbrt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@julienrbrt julienrbrt merged commit 73b21dd into cosmos:master Dec 12, 2024
7 of 8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants