-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
imp: fixed multi-chain support and added tests #215
Merged
+1,453
−221
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
23 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
3c2262e
feat: added multichain config and improved utils
srdtrk 9f9e269
feat: added new suite
srdtrk 739436a
feat: initial pass
srdtrk 15c2f41
Merge branch 'main' into serdar/59-multi-chain-e2e
srdtrk e581b1f
ci: added new test
srdtrk 0dd3050
rename
srdtrk b1787dd
imp: removed TendermintLightClientID and LastUpdate
srdtrk 75b142a
imp: completed test deploy
srdtrk 49769d8
fix: use lowercase address
srdtrk 0f03d3c
fix: test deploy
srdtrk 4f4d360
feat: test passing now
srdtrk 620f42f
ci: added new test to ci
srdtrk 9dbb128
feat: added cosmos <-> cosmos setup
srdtrk edd30f3
fix: fixed solidity tests
srdtrk 9bbab5b
feat: attempt to add new test
srdtrk 884a1a0
imp: fix deployment
srdtrk fc80186
fix: denom
srdtrk cfec36a
fix: attempt
srdtrk 2ac7129
style: rename variables
srdtrk ee242ca
refactor: cosmos tests
srdtrk 279673f
fix: attempt
srdtrk f8e4c4f
imp: disable build scripts
srdtrk dc06031
ci: fix workflows
srdtrk File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you add a test that catches this so we both document the behavior and make sure there are no regressions on this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I actually wanna revisit this code and potentially change it. I'll create an issue for this as I believe likely the same issue which effects ibc-go also might be effecting this repo. And this should begin a new design discussion which should be out of scope for this PR. Therefore the issue I will create is going to:
MsgSendPacket
ibc-go#7848 effects this repo (and create tests for it in solidity)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
#219