Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add
Lint/DuplicateBranch
rule #582base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Add
Lint/DuplicateBranch
rule #582Changes from all commits
74b2171
a839c9a
28837ac
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure if this change (and similar above) is a good choice.
This aspect has not yet been mentioned in the discussion or anywhere in the documentation and specs: some conditions have an effect on flow typing and merging conditions affects typing.
Here the different branches have technically the same body. But combining them introduce a union type
Crystal::Assign | Crystal::OpAssign
which can lead to all kinds of potentially unintended consequences.If we keep the branches separate, the type of
assign
is restricted to the respective type.The compiler uses this pattern intentionally in a number of places (including ones dealing with switching over AST nodes). So I would assume it's also intentional here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't see how this affects dispatch, see here: https://carc.in/#/r/hqb4