This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 10, 2024. It is now read-only.
Config: add understanding of imapd.conf BITFIELDs #153
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Wanted to make sure this works okay with older Cyrus releases... but it turns out the new Instance sanity checks in #146 can cause non-clean shutdown and cascading errors, and the sanity checks find problems on older Cyrus releases, so the tests all blow up dramatically. So off down another rabbit hole I go... |
|
Seems like this'll be okay once #154 is merged, so waiting for that. |
ksmurchison
approved these changes
Aug 30, 2021
This will let us treat 'httpmodules' et al as the set of flags it is, rather than an opaque string
elliefm
force-pushed
the
config-bitfields-support
branch
from
ccfa48e to
1400b1b
Compare
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This will let us treat 'httpmodules' et al as the set of flags it is, rather than an opaque string.
Need this for some refactoring I have planned for #151, but splitting it out so it can be reviewed separately