Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DNM fix CI failure on develop #6198

Closed
wants to merge 16 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

knst
Copy link
Collaborator

@knst knst commented Aug 12, 2024

Issue being fixed or feature implemented

To trigger CI for tsan

What was done?

Describe your changes in detail

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe in detail how you tested your changes.

Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran
to see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc.

Breaking Changes

Please describe any breaking changes your code introduces

Checklist:

Go over all the following points, and put an x in all the boxes that apply.

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have assigned this pull request to a milestone (for repository code-owners and collaborators only)

kwvg and others added 16 commits August 12, 2024 14:21
…Block

this commit will not work with `--enable-c++20` as c++20 does away with
aggregate initialization when constructors are declared. a partial
backport of bitcoin#24169 will sort that out.
…der`

Avoid TSan-reported data race

```
WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=360336)
  Write of size 8 at 0x7b5000002db8 by thread T15 (mutexes: write M0):
    #0 BlockManager::AddToBlockIndex(CBlockHeader const&, uint256 const&, CBlockIndex*&, BlockStatus) /src/dash/src/node/blockstorage.cpp:117:25 (dashd+0x44df7a) (BuildId: e27186c7ba08e897d376eb5779db9809baf7ad37)
    #1 ChainstateManager::AcceptBlockHeader(CBlockHeader const&, BlockValidationState&, CChainParams const&, CBlockIndex**) /src/dash/src/validation.cpp:3758:36 (dashd+0x83e45d) (BuildId: e27186c7ba08e897d376eb5779db9809baf7ad37)
    dashpay#2 CChainState::AcceptBlock(std::shared_ptr<CBlock const> const&, BlockValidationState&, CBlockIndex**, bool, FlatFilePos const*, bool*) /src/dash/src/validation.cpp:3812:37 (dashd+0x842848) (BuildId: e27186c7ba08e897d376eb5779db9809baf7ad37)
    [...]
  Previous read of size 8 at 0x7b5000002db8 by thread T12:
    #0 CDSNotificationInterface::UpdatedBlockTip(CBlockIndex const*, CBlockIndex const*, bool) /src/dash/src/dsnotificationinterface.cpp:82:42 (dashd+0x91e87e) (BuildId: e27186c7ba08e897d376eb5779db9809baf7ad37)
    #1 operator() /src/dash/src/validationinterface.cpp:199:79 (dashd+0x889f1e) (BuildId: e27186c7ba08e897d376eb5779db9809baf7ad37)
    dashpay#2 Iterate<(lambda at validationinterface.cpp:199:30)> /src/dash/src/validationinterface.cpp:88:17 (dashd+0x889f1e)
    [...]
[...]
SUMMARY: ThreadSanitizer: data race [...]
```
bitcoin#25454 introduces a 10 point penalty for remitting more than
MAX_BLOCKS_TO_ANNOUNCE unconnected block headers. Whether they are
connected or not is determined by taking the first entry and running
its hashPrevBlock through LookupBlockIndex. This new behaviour causes a
test failure in p2p_dos_header_tree.py in Dash.

Bitcoin doesn't face a test failure with this new behaviour as the first
non-fork block in its test data is the dump for block 1 (00000000b873e7
9784647a6c82962c70d228557d24a747ea4d1b8bbe878e1206) but Dash uses block
0 (00000bafbc94add76cb75e2ec92894837288a481e5c005f6563d91623bf8bc2c),
the genesis block.

By definition of a genesis block, it has a hashPrevBlock of 0, which
cannot be looked up. This trips the penalty. This doesn't cause any
problems in the field as nobody is expected to ever broadcast the
genesis block but it does cause a test failure for us.

We need to correct that by getting rid of the genesis block from the
test data.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants