Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

supported non-orthogonal cells for amber/md #276

Draft
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: devel
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

njzjz
Copy link
Member

@njzjz njzjz commented May 8, 2022

calls an external method ase.geometry.cellpar_to_cell. I am not sure if someone could rewrite it...

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented May 8, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #276 (a272a8a) into devel (a630608) will decrease coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is 40.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            devel     #276      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   81.48%   81.45%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files          61       61              
  Lines        5143     5145       +2     
==========================================
  Hits         4191     4191              
- Misses        952      954       +2     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
dpdata/amber/md.py 95.18% <40.00%> (-2.36%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a630608...a272a8a. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Contributor

@wanghan-iapcm wanghan-iapcm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you please add a UT for the non-orthogonal cells?

@njzjz njzjz marked this pull request as draft June 20, 2022 21:16
@njzjz njzjz self-assigned this Nov 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants