Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: pull lula main for threshold update #638

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Aug 19, 2024
Merged

Conversation

CloudBeard
Copy link
Contributor

@CloudBeard CloudBeard commented Aug 5, 2024

Description

Using Lula main branch to create new OSCAL assessment-resultsthreshold using the new deterministic changes to evaluate. This is still WIP as we want to run it against UDS Core to get the new OSCAL to prevent any possible breaking changes once a new Lula version has been released.

As apart of these changes we will also tag the lula-action to an official release version.

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Other (security config, docs update, etc)

Checklist before merging

@CloudBeard CloudBeard changed the title pull lula main for threshold update fix: pull lula main for threshold update Aug 5, 2024
@CloudBeard CloudBeard marked this pull request as ready for review August 16, 2024 15:25
@CloudBeard CloudBeard requested a review from a team as a code owner August 16, 2024 15:25
@CloudBeard CloudBeard marked this pull request as draft August 16, 2024 16:20
Copy link
Contributor

@mjnagel mjnagel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM overall, just the question on the missing properties.

compliance/oscal-assessment-results.yaml Show resolved Hide resolved
@CloudBeard CloudBeard marked this pull request as ready for review August 16, 2024 21:15
@mjnagel mjnagel enabled auto-merge (squash) August 19, 2024 13:37
@mjnagel mjnagel merged commit 5a34ce8 into main Aug 19, 2024
35 checks passed
@mjnagel mjnagel deleted the lula-threshold-update branch August 19, 2024 13:58
mjnagel pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 21, 2024
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


##
[0.26.0](v0.25.2...v0.26.0)
(2024-08-21)


### ⚠ BREAKING CHANGES

* client attribute allow list
([#676](#676))

### Features

* **azure:** azure blob storage support for velero
([#644](#644))
([eff9a82](eff9a82))
* support authservice with redis, switch to pepr helm chart
([#658](#658))
([e2fe58a](e2fe58a))


### Bug Fixes

* client attribute allow list
([#676](#676))
([100321e](100321e))
* handle client id names with special characters
([#659](#659))
([a84769e](a84769e))
* pull lula main for threshold update
([#638](#638))
([5a34ce8](5a34ce8))
* release-please config bump minor pre-major
([#680](#680))
([3f824c1](3f824c1))


### Miscellaneous

* add watch config to exemption watch
([#682](#682))
([7714ff8](7714ff8))
* **deps:** update grafana helm chart to v8.4.4
([#664](#664))
([77ea6f5](77ea6f5))
* **deps:** update pepr to 0.34.1
([#654](#654))
([6d4655d](6d4655d))
* **deps:** update promtail to v3.1.1
([#657](#657))
([c009e5f](c009e5f))
* **deps:** update test-infra
([#412](#412))
([a4c8fe9](a4c8fe9))
* **deps:** update test-infra (kms) to v0.0.5
([#667](#667))
([bd68637](bd68637))
* **deps:** update test-infra KMS to v0.0.4
([#663](#663))
([3c30b9f](3c30b9f))
* **deps:** update uds to v0.14.1
([#677](#677))
([12ec8a1](12ec8a1))
* **deps:** update velero kubectl image to v1.31.0
([#669](#669))
([d6b2f12](d6b2f12))
* **deps:** update velero to v7.1.5
([#671](#671))
([10ab714](10ab714))
* **deps:** update zarf to v0.38.1
([#616](#616))
([e0cb85d](e0cb85d))
* **deps:** update zarf to v0.38.2
([#668](#668))
([3328925](3328925))
* generate a schema for keycloak helm chart
([#627](#627))
([cf3a9e7](cf3a9e7))
* mute pepr on deploy action for migrating to helm chart
([#683](#683))
([9d05ddd](9d05ddd))
* **neuvector:** update source for unicorn images
([#675](#675))
([568efa2](568efa2))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants