-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
start geopandas extension #728
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
resolves #136 |
lonboard/geopandas.py
Outdated
def explore( | ||
self, | ||
column=None, | ||
cmap=None, | ||
scheme=None, | ||
k=6, | ||
categorical=False, | ||
elevation=None, | ||
extruded=False, | ||
elevation_scale=1, | ||
alpha=1, | ||
layer_kwargs=None, | ||
map_kwargs=None, | ||
classify_kwargs=None, | ||
nan_color=[255, 255, 255, 255], | ||
color=None, | ||
wireframe=False, | ||
tiles="CartoDB Darkmatter", | ||
m=None, | ||
): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you expand on what differences (if any) there are with the upstream geopandas.explore method? I think we'd want it to be as similar as possible.
That would be great to include in this docstring.
Additionally, ideally there would be a way to get valid type hinting here, but presumably that won't work if this is added at runtime to the GeoDataFrame instance.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sure happy to add both. In general I tried to keep all possible arguments the same (hence the tiles
that uses a str --> class--> str, which isn't ideal but I'm hard conditioned to type tiles='CartoDB Positron') any time I explore.
the one thing I know is different is classification_kwargs
used here vs classification_kwds
used in geopandas, but I'll switch it to martin's version for compat. Otherwise, any arguments available in explore have the same name. Those that don't map between the two are unique to the backengs, e.g. layer_kwargs
here vs style_kwds
in vanilla explore
also I generally use numpy docstrings but I think the rest of the packages uses another format, so I should probably update that too
Keep me in the loop. Happy to do a proper review of this from the geopandas perspective once @kylebarron is happy. |
i think this should be ready, though I'm not the best with type hints or google docstrings |
Can you check why pre-commit is still failing? You should be able to run it locally with
|
to begin review. The notebook at examples/explore should run through and demonstrate functionality. I need to take a look at how you prefer to test against Maps