-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Provide override option when import generic assay data (for review) #3
base: remove_treatment_implementation
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Provide override option when import generic assay data (for review) #3
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am worried by a single hard-coded true
in the profile import.
Also, should there not be an update of the importer python script that is related to this new parameter?
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ public void run() { | |||
importer.importData(); | |||
} else if (geneticProfile.getGeneticAlterationType() == GeneticAlterationType.GENERIC_ASSAY) { | |||
// add all missing `genetic_entities` for this assay to the database | |||
ImportGenericAssayEntity.importData(dataFile, geneticProfile.getGeneticAlterationType(), geneticProfile.getOtherMetaDataField("generic_entity_meta_properties")); | |||
ImportGenericAssayEntity.importData(dataFile, geneticProfile.getGeneticAlterationType(), geneticProfile.getOtherMetaDataField("generic_entity_meta_properties"), true); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why do we always overwrite the entities when importing profiles? Should this not be linked to the CLI variable?
bb28783
to
3e34e3e
Compare
81d2a1b
to
f1d5990
Compare
9e26e04
to
3409612
Compare
4ad7a96
to
8875419
Compare
3409612
to
6d6946a
Compare
Previously, SV genetic profile was automatically generated for fusion files, but this could result in adding multiple genetic profiles with same names causing an exception Added unit tests for "split" fusions file
…ticprofile Add a check for existing "SV Genetic Profile" during import
Extend valid mRNA expression profile ids
Filter enrichments with no mapped gene object
update references to tcga provisional
CoExpression: fix error while querying for geneset molecular profile
Add case list sample counts api in study view
Update example_commands.md
…er-from-docs Remove skin.custom_header from docs
add v3.3.0 news item
6d6946a
to
7fc1224
Compare
03d779d
to
7fc1224
Compare
* Update Deployment-Procedure.md
Temporary fix for error in mutation enrichments
ce8dc6a
to
86812c4
Compare
Fix cBioPortal#7442. Publish docker images for each tag on github Note that we can't reuse the existing master image as proposed in the issue, because the version in the pom is determined on the fly from git i.e. the latest master version shows a different version in the api/info response than a proper tagged version even though the code might be completely the same otherwise.
…-action-docker Publish tags to docker hub
…y are shared with other studies
790166b
to
33f9027
Compare
33f9027
to
85693e8
Compare
Provide override option when import generic assay data
related document updated here.
Changes in this pr:
updateInfo
) when import generic assay data.