Jenkinsfile: add Rocky Linux and AlmaLinux #323

AkihiroSuda · 2023-08-03T22:12:21Z

CentOS Stream 8 will reach its EOL within less than a year ahead of Rocky and Alma:

CentOS Stream 8: 2024-05-31
Rocky Linux 8: 2029-05-31
AlmaLinux 8: 2029

So RPMs for Rocky and Alma have to be built without depending on CentOS Stream.

Part of :

Build RPMs for Rocky and Alma (without reusing CentOS Stream RPMs) docker-ce-packaging#933

crazy-max · 2023-08-05T08:05:08Z

Looks like the pipeline doesn't take into account the new entries in the Jenkinsfile: https://ci-next.docker.com/teams-core/blue/organizations/jenkins/containerd-packaging/detail/PR-323/3/pipeline (probably missing permissions on Jenkins)

Fyi, I made some tests to build containerd in docker/packaging repo:

AkihiroSuda · 2023-08-05T08:20:49Z

Thanks, but I can't see the logs on Jenkins (missing "Read" permission)

アクセスできません

⛔ AkihiroSuda には、全体/Read パーミッションがありません。

AkihiroSuda · 2023-09-06T02:50:25Z

@thaJeztah PTAL 🙏

thaJeztah · 2023-09-15T12:40:53Z

Jenkinsfile

+    [image: "docker.io/library/rockylinux:8.8",         arches: ["amd64", "aarch64"]], // Rocky Linux 8 (EOL: 2029-05-31)
+    [image: "docker.io/library/rockylinux:9.2",         arches: ["amd64", "aarch64"]], // Rocky Linux 9 (EOL: 2032-05-31)
+    [image: "docker.io/library/almalinux:8.8",          arches: ["amd64", "aarch64"]], // AlmaLinux 8 (EOL: 2029)
+    [image: "docker.io/library/almalinux:9.2",          arches: ["amd64", "aarch64"]], // AlmaLinux 9 (EOL: 2032)


Some questions; perhaps you're able to answer (I didn't investigate yet);

Do rocky and alma support minor versions, or do they use a rolling release model as CentOS did (i.e. CentOS 7.2 becomes EOL once 7.3 is released).

Do rocky and/or alma also have $releasever (which can vary, and may have minor version, or may have (e.g.) 8Server etc)? Asking, because we've had a lot of issues with those (and we still haven't fully fixed that)

Some questions; perhaps you're able to answer (I didn't investigate yet);

Do rocky and alma support minor versions, or do they use a rolling release model as CentOS did (i.e. CentOS 7.2 becomes EOL once 7.3 is released).

The latter one.

Do rocky and/or alma also have $releasever (which can vary, and may have minor version, or may have (e.g.) 8Server etc)? Asking, because we've had a lot of issues with those (and we still haven't fully fixed that)

Yes, the value is like 9, not like 9.2.

https://dl.rockylinux.org/pub/rocky/ have subdirs with minor vers, but they are almost useless:

https://dl.rockylinux.org/pub/rocky/9/: ✅ seems symlinked to 9.2

https://dl.rockylinux.org/pub/rocky/9.0/: ❌ Already empty except README.txt. The contents were moved to https://dl.rockylinux.org/vault/rocky/9.0/

https://dl.rockylinux.org/pub/rocky/9.1/: ❌ Already empty except README.txt. The contents were moved to https://dl.rockylinux.org/vault/rocky/9.1/

https://dl.rockylinux.org/pub/rocky/9.2/ : ✅ the latest release, as of time of writing this

The situation is same for Alma too https://repo.almalinux.org/almalinux/

dnf on rocky 9.1 accesses the rocky 9.2 repo:

$ docker run -it --rm rockylinux:9.1 [root@c19222d20aa4 /]# cat /etc/os-release NAME="Rocky Linux" VERSION="9.1 (Blue Onyx)" ID="rocky" ID_LIKE="rhel centos fedora" VERSION_ID="9.1" PLATFORM_ID="platform:el9" PRETTY_NAME="Rocky Linux 9.1 (Blue Onyx)" ANSI_COLOR="0;32" LOGO="fedora-logo-icon" CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:rocky:rocky:9::baseos" HOME_URL="https://rockylinux.org/" BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.rockylinux.org/" ROCKY_SUPPORT_PRODUCT="Rocky-Linux-9" ROCKY_SUPPORT_PRODUCT_VERSION="9.1" REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT="Rocky Linux" REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT_VERSION="9.1" [root@c19222d20aa4 /]# cat /etc/yum.repos.d/rocky.repo ... [baseos] name=Rocky Linux $releasever - BaseOS mirrorlist=https://mirrors.rockylinux.org/mirrorlist?arch=$basearch&repo=BaseOS-$release ver$rltype #baseurl=http://dl.rockylinux.org/$contentdir/$releasever/BaseOS/$basearch/os/ gpgcheck=1 enabled=1 countme=1 metadata_expire=6h gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-Rocky-9 ... [root@c19222d20aa4 /]# dnf -v repolist --enabled ... Repo-id : baseos Repo-name : Rocky Linux 9 - BaseOS Repo-revision : 1694020832 Repo-updated : Wed Sep 6 17:20:32 2023 Repo-pkgs : 1156 Repo-available-pkgs: 1156 Repo-size : 1.2 G Repo-mirrors : https://mirrors.rockylinux.org/mirrorlist?arch=x86_64&repo=BaseOS-9 Repo-baseurl : http://ftp.riken.jp/Linux/rocky/9.2/BaseOS/x86_64/os/ (28 more) Repo-expire : 21600 second(s) (last: Fri Sep 15 13:57:49 2023) Repo-filename : /etc/yum.repos.d/rocky.repo ...

$releasever is expanded to 9:

$ docker run -it --rm rockylinux:9.1 [root@117abf8b612e /]# dnf install -q -y dnf-plugins-core Importing GPG key 0x350D275D: Userid : "Rocky Enterprise Software Foundation - Release key 2022 <[email protected]>" Fingerprint: 21CB 256A E16F C54C 6E65 2949 702D 426D 350D 275D From : /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-Rocky-9 Installed: dbus-libs-1:1.12.20-7.el9_2.1.x86_64 dnf-plugins-core-4.3.0-5.el9_2.noarch python3-dateutil-1:2.8.1-6.el9.noarch python3-dbus-1.2.18-2.el9.x86_64 python3-dnf-plugins-core-4.3.0-5.el9_2.noarch python3-six-1.15.0-9.el9.noarch python3-systemd-234-18.el9.x86_64 [root@117abf8b612e /]# dnf config-manager --dump-variables arch = x86_64 basearch = x86_64 rltype = stream = 9-stream infra = container sigcontentdir = pub/sig contentdir = pub/rocky releasever = 9

Ah, thanks! So, if I interpret that correctly, they also follow a rolling release model, so we should consider using 7, 8 (and no need to look at "minor" releases, as they effectively don't exist), correct?

Ah, thanks! So, if I interpret that correctly, they also follow a rolling release model, so we should consider using 7, 8 (and no need to look at "minor" releases, as they effectively don't exist), correct?

Yes, updated PR.

AkihiroSuda · 2023-09-15T14:12:28Z

Updated PR to remove minor ver

thaJeztah · 2023-09-15T14:20:32Z

Jenkinsfile

+    [image: "quay.io/centos/centos:stream8",            arches: ["amd64", "aarch64"]], // EOL: 2024-05-31
+    [image: "quay.io/centos/centos:stream9",            arches: ["amd64", "aarch64"]], // EOL: 2027
+    [image: "docker.io/library/rockylinux:8",           arches: ["amd64", "aarch64"]], // Rocky Linux 8 (EOL: 2029-05-31)
+    [image: "docker.io/library/rockylinux:9",           arches: ["amd64", "aarch64"]], // Rocky Linux 9 (EOL: 2032-05-31)
+    [image: "docker.io/library/almalinux:8",            arches: ["amd64", "aarch64"]], // AlmaLinux 8 (EOL: 2029)
+    [image: "docker.io/library/almalinux:9",            arches: ["amd64", "aarch64"]], // AlmaLinux 9 (EOL: 2032)
    [image: "docker.io/library/debian:buster",          arches: ["amd64", "aarch64", "armhf"]], // Debian 10 (EOL: 2024)
    [image: "docker.io/library/debian:bullseye",        arches: ["amd64", "aarch64", "armhf"]], // Debian 11 (stable)
    [image: "docker.io/library/debian:bookworm",        arches: ["amd64", "aarch64", "armhf"]], // Debian 12 (next stable)


🙈 Is it ok to update the // comments to be aligned with the other ones?

Better to change it now than to do a follow up if that's ok with you 🤗

Thank you! Sorry for that ❤️

thaJeztah · 2023-09-15T14:22:50Z

FWIW I'll probably have to carry this PR after it's "ok" to verify CI (because Jenkins doesn't pick up changes from people without write access)

Signed-off-by: Akihiro Suda <[email protected]>

thaJeztah · 2023-09-15T14:43:22Z

Pushed as a separate PR, but it's the same commit, so we'd be able to merge the original (this) one if CI looks happy on the other PR #326

thaJeztah · 2023-09-15T14:44:28Z

⚠️ for others arriving here; we haven't decided yet if we'll be adding these 4 new distros/versions to the list of packages on download.docker.com, but merging this PR allows CI on this repository to verify that builds work.

Signed-off-by: Akihiro Suda <[email protected]>

thaJeztah · 2023-09-15T15:17:01Z

CI is happy on the other PR; 🎉

thaJeztah

LGTM

AkihiroSuda mentioned this pull request Aug 3, 2023

Build RPMs for Rocky and Alma (without reusing CentOS Stream RPMs) docker/docker-ce-packaging#933

Open

3 tasks

AkihiroSuda force-pushed the rocky branch 2 times, most recently from d6a777b to b0a0fcf Compare August 3, 2023 22:27

thaJeztah reviewed Sep 15, 2023

View reviewed changes

AkihiroSuda force-pushed the rocky branch from b0a0fcf to f710be6 Compare September 15, 2023 14:09

thaJeztah reviewed Sep 15, 2023

View reviewed changes

Jenkinsfile: fix comment style

7b389fe

Signed-off-by: Akihiro Suda <[email protected]>

AkihiroSuda force-pushed the rocky branch from 1504ecc to 5c9ecac Compare September 15, 2023 14:28

thaJeztah mentioned this pull request Sep 15, 2023

Jenkinsfile: add Rocky Linux and AlmaLinux [carry 323] #326

Merged

Jenkinsfile: add Rocky Linux and AlmaLinux

967611b

Signed-off-by: Akihiro Suda <[email protected]>

AkihiroSuda force-pushed the rocky branch from 5c9ecac to 967611b Compare September 15, 2023 14:52

thaJeztah approved these changes Sep 15, 2023

View reviewed changes

thaJeztah merged commit 2d8a212 into docker:master Sep 15, 2023
1 check passed

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Jenkinsfile: add Rocky Linux and AlmaLinux #323

Jenkinsfile: add Rocky Linux and AlmaLinux #323

AkihiroSuda commented Aug 3, 2023

crazy-max commented Aug 5, 2023

AkihiroSuda commented Aug 5, 2023 •

edited

Loading

アクセスできません

AkihiroSuda commented Sep 6, 2023

thaJeztah Sep 15, 2023

AkihiroSuda Sep 15, 2023 •

edited

Loading

AkihiroSuda Sep 15, 2023 •

edited

Loading

AkihiroSuda Sep 15, 2023

thaJeztah Sep 15, 2023

AkihiroSuda Sep 15, 2023

AkihiroSuda commented Sep 15, 2023

thaJeztah Sep 15, 2023

AkihiroSuda Sep 15, 2023

thaJeztah Sep 15, 2023

thaJeztah commented Sep 15, 2023

thaJeztah commented Sep 15, 2023

thaJeztah commented Sep 15, 2023

thaJeztah commented Sep 15, 2023

thaJeztah left a comment

Jenkinsfile: add Rocky Linux and AlmaLinux #323

Jenkinsfile: add Rocky Linux and AlmaLinux #323

Conversation

AkihiroSuda commented Aug 3, 2023

crazy-max commented Aug 5, 2023

AkihiroSuda commented Aug 5, 2023 • edited Loading

アクセスできません

AkihiroSuda commented Sep 6, 2023

thaJeztah Sep 15, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

AkihiroSuda Sep 15, 2023 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

AkihiroSuda Sep 15, 2023 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

AkihiroSuda Sep 15, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

thaJeztah Sep 15, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

AkihiroSuda Sep 15, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

AkihiroSuda commented Sep 15, 2023

thaJeztah Sep 15, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

AkihiroSuda Sep 15, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

thaJeztah Sep 15, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

thaJeztah commented Sep 15, 2023

thaJeztah commented Sep 15, 2023

thaJeztah commented Sep 15, 2023

thaJeztah commented Sep 15, 2023

thaJeztah left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

AkihiroSuda commented Aug 5, 2023 •

edited

Loading

AkihiroSuda Sep 15, 2023 •

edited

Loading

AkihiroSuda Sep 15, 2023 •

edited

Loading