-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: associate with Dockerfile.* #18
Open
scop
wants to merge
1
commit into
dprint:main
Choose a base branch
from
scop:feat/dockerfile-dot-all
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is arguably a bit of a hack/abuse (I have a feeling that
file_names
was not intended to be used with globs in the entries), but looking at dprint main sources, I think it would work. Setting upfile_prefixes
for something like this would sound a bit overkill to me.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, it won't work. This doesn't do pattern matching.
I think the only way to make this work in dprint is for someone to manually add "associations" (https://dprint.dev/config/#associations) under their dockerfile config.
Overall, I'm not too interested in suporting the
dockerfile.*
convention out of the box because it's a bad convention and it's good docker has switched over to using a file extension.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For reference, I think this will work today:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The reason I think it could work is that
file_names
entries seem to be just concatenated to**/
and it doesn't seem there's anything magical whether the entries are globs or plain filenames: https://github.com/dprint/dprint/blob/14eb074e9baf8d0533f04ad954e17a5a375e6385/crates/dprint/src/paths.rs#L161Using "associations" works, I'm using that currently, but it's a chore that one has to repeat all the built in globs in it. I find that surprising because it seems they would be appended to the existing builtin globs: https://github.com/dprint/dprint/blob/14eb074e9baf8d0533f04ad954e17a5a375e6385/crates/dprint/src/paths.rs#L163-L164
Alas, if I define
...then only
Dockerfile.*
match. Need to addDockerfile
and*.dockerfile
there to get them back.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, yeah, maybe it will work. You can try building by calling:
dprint-plugin-dockerfile/.github/workflows/ci.yml
Line 37 in d208687
Then the wasm file will be somewhere in the
target
folder (just import the file relatively from your dprint.config file)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmph, doesn't seem to work for some reason after all :/
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It expands to this glob:
I guess that doesn't work. Maybe the dprint cli could be updated to support some basic wildcards in filenames to make it work.