Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix(integrity): do not require ls #2446

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 26, 2023
Merged

fix(integrity): do not require ls #2446

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 26, 2023

Conversation

Henrik66
Copy link
Contributor

ls is not used by the integrity dracut module.

@Henrik66
fix(integrity): do not require ls
bfe2184 
ls is not used by the integrity dracut module.
@github-actions github-actions bot added modules Issue tracker for all modules integrity Issues related to the integrity module labels Jul 26, 2023
LaszloGombos
LaszloGombos approved these changes Jul 26, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@LaszloGombos LaszloGombos left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks

@LaszloGombos LaszloGombos merged commit a804945 into dracutdevs:master Jul 26, 2023
68 of 78 checks passed
@Henrik66 Henrik66 deleted the ls branch July 26, 2023 16:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@LaszloGombos LaszloGombos LaszloGombos approved these changes

@aafeijoo-suse aafeijoo-suse aafeijoo-suse approved these changes

@haraldh haraldh Awaiting requested review from haraldh haraldh is a code owner

@johannbg johannbg Awaiting requested review from johannbg johannbg is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
integrity Issues related to the integrity module modules Issue tracker for all modules
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@Henrik66 @LaszloGombos @aafeijoo-suse