Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat(bpdm-system-test): golden record tester module. #1070

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

SujitMBRDI
Copy link
Contributor

@SujitMBRDI SujitMBRDI commented Oct 10, 2024

Description

In this pull request, we have created golden record process tester application.
The application can be executed and also packaged as a JAR as usual.

Pre-review checks

Please ensure to do as many of the following checks as possible, before asking for committer review:

@SujitMBRDI SujitMBRDI changed the title Feat/bpdm system tester wip Feat(bpdm-system-test): golden record tester module. Oct 10, 2024
@SujitMBRDI SujitMBRDI force-pushed the feat/bpdm-system-tester-wip branch 2 times, most recently from ea78b8b to c5208ec Compare October 10, 2024 11:28
@SujitMBRDI SujitMBRDI marked this pull request as ready for review October 10, 2024 11:34
@SujitMBRDI SujitMBRDI force-pushed the feat/bpdm-system-tester-wip branch 2 times, most recently from e266131 to 2a5db4b Compare October 18, 2024 11:05
@SujitMBRDI SujitMBRDI force-pushed the feat/bpdm-system-tester-wip branch 3 times, most recently from dff7342 to ee85800 Compare October 30, 2024 05:44
feat(bpdm-system-test): golden record tester module

Feat(bpdm-system-test): golden record tester module WIP

feat(bpdm-system-test): golden record tester module

feat(bpdm-system-test): updated docker file.

feat(bpdm-system-test): golden record tester module.
@nicoprow nicoprow added this to the BPDM v6.3.0 / R25.03. milestone Nov 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: 👀 In review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants