Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add contract reference policy #177

Conversation

jjeroch
Copy link
Contributor

@jjeroch jjeroch commented Jul 25, 2024

Description

Adding ContractReference policy with attributes and all links

Why

Part of the new standard

Issue

#176

Checklist

Definition of Done

  • New "contractReference" policy added to the system
  • Right operand set to "{bilateralContractName}"
  • Policy applicable for any useCase type
  • Policy can get used for "Usage" types only
  • Policy active as of today's date
  • No regex or transactional attributes required

Copy link
Contributor

@evegufy evegufy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why was main merged in this branch? it's going to the release branch and in the diff, I see loads of things not related to this change

@jjeroch
Copy link
Contributor Author

jjeroch commented Jul 25, 2024

why was main merged in this branch? it's going to the release branch and in the diff, I see loads of things not related to this change

Anwenderfehler. Schauen gerade ob wir das noch raus bekommen oder nen neuen PR benötigen

@Phil91 Phil91 force-pushed the feat-add-ContractReference-policy branch from 9b132bc to 9d247af Compare July 25, 2024 11:07
@Phil91
Copy link
Member

Phil91 commented Jul 25, 2024

why was main merged in this branch? it's going to the release branch and in the diff, I see loads of things not related to this change

I did rebase to the rc.2 branch.

@jjeroch fyi

@Phil91 Phil91 requested a review from evegufy July 25, 2024 11:08
@evegufy evegufy merged commit 4faa2db into eclipse-tractusx:release/v1.1.0-rc.2 Jul 25, 2024
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants