Add flag to ignore the MigrationHistory table from the naming conventions

[EraYaN]

I put some tests in for now that should test the column names. (And the table name, but that doesn't change).

Not sure if this is the right way to go with the FullName test against a string, but it seems quite unlikely to have a name collision there.

Closes #1

[cbordeman]

Please merge this! When I first apply the naming conventions extension, I am seeing:

SELECT migration_id, product_version
FROM "__EFMigrationsHistory"
ORDER BY migration_id;

column "migration_id" does not exist

[EraYaN]

@roji Thoughts? Is this a direction that might make it into the code base?

[EraYaN]

Resolved the merge conflicts.

[EraYaN]

Made the tests make sense.

[EraYaN]

@roji This is now properly ready I think

[roji]

I'll try to take a look at this in the coming week or two, thanks.

[peterbomers]

Is it possible to merge this PR?
We want to use the namening convention plugin for existing databases and we don't want to migrate the migration history table.

Thanks in advance!

[EraYaN]

I have rebased this to the latest 7.0.0 version.

[steingran]

I bumped into this exact issue, which is a very annoying problem. @roji any chance you could take a look at this PR and potentially approve running the workflows on the PR? Then we can get one step further toward a solution.

[roji]

Everyone, sorry I haven't been able to look at this PR (or the problem it attempts to fix). The 7.0 release is currently taking up most of my time, once things quiet down I'll try to look at this.

Thanks for your patience.

[EraYaN]

I have rebased this to the latest 7.0.2 version.

[EraYaN]

@roji Did you have a chance to take a look at this PR?

[EraYaN]

Would it be possible to get this one in for the 8.0 version? @bricelam

[EraYaN]

I have rebased this for 8.0.2 on current main.

[EraYaN]

Rebased this to 8.0.3 (current main)

[steingran]

@roji Any chance we could progress on this PR? @EraYaN has done a great job rebasing it on the latest versions of EF Core as time (and versions) has gone by

[roji]

@steingran unfortunately there's not much chance I'll be able to find time for this in the near future. I traditionally do a concentrated spike of work near the end of the release, i.e. for EFCore.NamingConventions 9.0 - that should happen in a few months. I do promise to give this issue priority when I do...

[peterbomers]

@steingran unfortunately there's not much chance I'll be able to find time for this in the near future. I traditionally do a concentrated spike of work near the end of the release, i.e. for EFCore.NamingConventions 9.0 - that should happen in a few months. I do promise to give this issue priority when I do...

Is it possible to include this (.NET) 9.0 version?
(it allows me to cleanup some ugly code)