Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Phil/resource path pointers #284

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 4, 2023
Merged

Phil/resource path pointers #284

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 4, 2023

Conversation

psFried
Copy link
Member

@psFried psFried commented Nov 28, 2023

This is part of estuary/flow#1285. It updates the airbyte connectors to use the new approach for merging discovered bindings, based on resource_path_pointers.

@@ -261,6 +259,7 @@ mod test {
resource_config_json: "{}".to_string(),
collection: None,
field_config_json_map: BTreeMap::new(),
backfill: 7,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what is this? 😁

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The backfill field was added to the protocol recently (estuary/flow#1276). I had to add it here because I updated the proto-flow dependency.

Copy link
Member

@mdibaiee mdibaiee left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@psFried
Copy link
Member Author

psFried commented Nov 29, 2023

@mdibaiee I realized this needs more work before it should merge. The revert of 35e7f91 unintentionally reverts a fix for a subtle bug in airbyte-to-flow. Should have a re-worked version ready shortly.

This allows these connectors to take advantage of the new discover merge behavior.
@psFried psFried merged commit c20b4a9 into master Dec 4, 2023
56 of 57 checks passed
@psFried psFried deleted the phil/resource-path-pointers branch December 4, 2023 16:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants